• maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep … agreed all round.

    While decentralisation has advantages, the fediverse will probably have to learn the hard way that from a user perspective, without a layer on top that polishes the UX experience, it’s a net negative unless you’re a nerd and interested in it for its own sake. It’s a classic case of tech people making something that works for them and not for others.

    The parts of the fediverse that are truly valuable IMO …

    1. FOSS platforms,
    2. diversity and experimentation of platforms and UXs and communities (all of which feed on each other IMO)
    3. Freedom for the user to chose and create spaces and interfaces in the ecosystem, which again comes from the above, but is something the fediverse is struggling with. Overall the user is a second class citizen on the fediverse and there is insufficient glue between the pieces for them to come together as a cohesive whole for the user.
    • mafbar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fragmentation that occurs as a consequence of this decentralised way of conducting social media is probably going to be the natural state of the fediverse for years to come. By its very nature, being decentralised, federated instances are not going to amass hundreds of thousands or millions of users from all (most) walks of life, and only appeal to those with a certain type of mind with nerdy, freedom-centric, and dedicated tendencies. By its very design, it’s not going to catch on most people.