Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agoIs this a Nut?media.gehirneimer.deimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11.28K
arrow-up11.28KimageIs this a Nut?media.gehirneimer.deSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareAMDIsOurLord@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up17·8 months agoAlso they’re always treating C++ like it’s some arcane enterprise variant that uses 1990s C++ Using modern C++ you can write much cleaner, more usable, and really safe code
minus-squareriodoro1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoHaving a thorough process and an engineer approach in software development is also pretty handy. There weren’t many bugs in the AGC. Yet it was programmed mostly in assembly and people had no trouble trusting it with their life.
Also they’re always treating C++ like it’s some arcane enterprise variant that uses 1990s C++
Using modern C++ you can write much cleaner, more usable, and really safe code
Having a thorough process and an engineer approach in software development is also pretty handy. There weren’t many bugs in the AGC. Yet it was programmed mostly in assembly and people had no trouble trusting it with their life.