• BraBraBra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sure, if we can build the infrastructure for cars there, why not trains too. You’re quite closed minded. But also, why can’t you just bike in a village? I mentioned cities because that’s where trains tend to be, genius.

    There’s trams, there’s bikes, there’s buses, etc. etc. etc.

    • Shifty McCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I’ll just bike through 4 feet of snow to get to town. Roads don’t need to fall within specific tolerances to operate either, like tracks. Have you ever been to the country? Anywhere that snows? You sound like “city folk” to me and you throwing around “closed minded” and “genius” when someone else brings up a contradictory point makes you sound more like “city asshole”. Maybe keep the conversation civil, eh?

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are several alternatives to trains. It was the appropriate example for cities. This is dead simple. If you’re gonna be a condescending, mocking asshole all while completely missing the point, you’re gonna get some sass. Simple as, fuck off if you can’t handle it.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why can’t you just bike in a village?

      It’s not about biking in a village. It’s about biking out of a village to a denser urban center. The place where the trains are.

      You’re quite closed minded.

      I think it’s closed minded to assume that trains and bikes can replace all utility of cars, or that cars will never be in a state where the impact on the environment is negligible.

      there’s buses

      That’s just a big fucking car.

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the infrastructure exists for cars, it can exist for trains.

        1 bus > 25 cars. Or how many ever it seats.

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Btw, I’m pretty sure places that are that remote rely on planes. Some parts of alaska are like that if I’m remembering correctly.