I know there are other ways of accomplishing that, but this might be a convenient way of doing it. I’m wondering though if Reddit is still reverting these changes?

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s pretend for a moment that we know that Reddit has any sort of decent versioning system, and that it keeps the old versions of your comments alongside the newer ones, and that it’s feeding the LLM with the old version. (Does it? I have my doubts, given that Reddit Inc. isn’t exactly competent.)

    Even then, I think that it’s sensible to use this tool, to scorch the earth and discourage other human users from adding their own content to that platform. It still means less data for Google to say “it’s a bunch of users, who cares about the intellectual property of those filthy things? Their data is now my data. Feed it to the wolves to Gemini”.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Let’s pretend for a moment that we know that Reddit has any sort of decent versioning system, and that it keeps the old versions of your comments alongside the newer ones, and that it’s feeding the LLM with the old version. (Does it? I have my doubts, given that Reddit Inc. isn’t exactly competent.)

      They almost certainly do, if only because of the practicalities of adding a new comment, then having that be fetched in place of the old one, compared to making and propagating an edit across all their databases. With exceptions, it’d be a bit easier to implement it as an additional comment, and increment a version number that you fetch the latest version of, rather than needing to scan through the entire database to make changes.

      It would also help with any administration/moderation tasks if they could see whether people posted rule-breaking content and then tried to hide it behind edits.

      That said, one of the many Spez controversies did show that they are capable of making actual edits on the back end if they wished.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        10 months ago

        They almost certainly do, if only because of the practicalities of adding a new comment

        If this is true, it shifts the problem from “not having it” to “not knowing which version should be used” (to train the LLM).

        They could feed it the unedited versions and call it a day, but a lot of times people edit their content to correct it or add further info, specially for “meatier” content (like tutorials). So there’s still some value on the edits, and I believe that Google will be at least tempted to use them.

        If that’s correct, editing it with nonsense will lower the value of edited comments for the sake of LLM training. It should have an impact, just not as big as if they kept no version system.

        It would also help with any administration/moderation tasks if they could see whether people posted rule-breaking content and then tried to hide it behind edits.

        I know from experience (I’m a former Reddit janny) that moderators can’t see earlier versions of the content, only the last one. The admins might though.

        That said, one of the many Spez controversies did show that they are capable of making actual edits on the back end if they wished.

        The one from TD, right?

        • spez: “let them babble their violent rhetoric. Freeze peaches!”
        • also spez: “nooo they’re casting me on a bad light. I’m going to edit it!”
        • londos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Honestly, parsing through version history is actually something an LLM could handle. It might even make more sense of it than without. For example, if someone replies to a comment and then the parent is edited to say something different. No one will have to waste their time filtering anything.

          • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            They could use an LLM to parse through the version history of all those posts/comments, to use it to train another LLM with it. It sounds like a bad (and expensive, processing time-wise) idea, but it could be done.

            EDIT: thinking further on this, it’s actually fairly doable. It’s generally a bad idea to feed the output of an LLM into another, but in this case you’re simply using it to pick one among multiple versions of a post/comment made by a human being.

            It’s still worth to scorch the earth though, so other human users don’t bother with the platform.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      What if we edit the comments slowly, words or even letters at a time. Then, if they save all of the edits they will end up with a lot of pointless versions. And if they dont, the buffer will eventually get full and original gets lost

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ll ping @lemmyvore@feddit.nl because the answer is relevant for both.

        Another user mentioned the possibility that they could use an LLM to sort this shit out. If that’s correct neither slow edits nor multiple edits will do much, as the LLM could simply pick the best version of each comment.

        And while it’s a bit silly to use LLM to sort data out to train another LLM, this sounds like the sort of shit that Google could and would do.

    • chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Let’s also pretend that reddit isn’t a cesspool of bots, marketing campaigns, foreign agents, incels, racists, Republicans, gun nuts, shit posters, trolls…the list goes on.

      Is it even that valuable? It didn’t take long for that Microsoft bot to turn into Hitler, feeding reddit into an “AI” is like speed running Ultron.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s still somewhat valuable due to the size of the corpus (it’s huge) and because people used to share technical expertise there.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Even if they had comment versioning, who’s gonna dig through the versions to figure out which are nonsense. Just use the overwrite tool several times and then wish them good luck.