• doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    You seem to have no idea that there are places with zero options aside from cars right now. I live in such a place. You criticized the statement “I need to drive my car and I need to park it.” I do advocate for better but there are no legitimate qualifiers to that statement. I still need to. Period.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not if you can’t afford to move. And other people would still live there even if you could. So I’m just advocating and it’s slowly working.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      You seemed to have missed the part where I said

      They may be personally necessary in the current system, but the system itself isn’t necessary, and this is critiquing the system.

      You may need to drive because the system forces you to do so to live. But that system that forces you to drive isn’t necessary and we can work to change it. If you are working to change that than good. If you dismiss problems with the current system by naturalizing it with unqualified statements like “I need to …” Then that’s a problem, you should instead say “I’m forced to…”

      Like if the government is restricting your speech statements like “I need to not criticize the government” makes that seem unchangeable and just the way things are, if you say " I’m forced to not criticize the government" or qualify it with “I need to not criticize the government because it’s repressive” then that shows there’s nothing natural about it and that some system is preventing you from doing something, not nature. Then you can recognize the system can change and work towards changing the system, instead of accepting it and moving on.