• Spiracle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay?

    If you want a more LEGO-like feel, you can probably replace the high quality printed blocks with some stickers.

      • Spiracle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Edit: I misunderstood the sets the above post was referring to.

        Definitely need some stickers, at least, for this.
        the miniscule size
        Lego Millenium Falcon

        I’m about 80% sure you are being sarcastic at this point. Just to be sure:

        1. The BlueBrixx sets print unique design elements like names, numbers, coloured lines directly onto the bricks. LEGO is known for adding packs of cheap stickers for most of that.
        2. The ready room picture is, afaik, one of the more iconic objects associated with Picard.
        3. The painting is 1m x 0.5m with some depth.
        4. The Lego Millennium Falcon has ~2.5 as many pieces for ~4.5 as high a price. (Using the regular price, which is €189.95, btw, ten less than you wrote.)
        5. Intricate details I cannot judge from the pictures. I suppose that comparing a painting set to a ship that’s several times as expensive may also not be the easiest to compare, even in person.

        The Star Trek ships should be bigger and cost more, or cheaper and cost less. Not the same amount for far, far less.

        That’s, like, your opinion. Personally, I think €850 for a single set is a bit much. I’d rather have 5 smaller sets for that price. That said, Bluebrixx does plenty of ships that are “cheaper and cost less”, down to tiny sets for ~€10 each.

          • Spiracle@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, I complete misread part of your first post.

            The repulsive Picard picture on the Enterprise D,

            Looking at the catalogue, the first is “Picard ready room painting”, and I somehow mixed the two together. Complete reading comprehension failure on my part. All the other erroneous points in my post followed from that. Sorry!


            That said, the whole thing still seems to be an issue of “your mileage may vary”. I’m pretty sure I’ve seen the image of Picard on some other official Star Trek stuff at well. (DVD Box art?) I wouldn’t describe it as “repulsive”.

            Comparing https://www.lego.com/en-de/product/millennium-falcon-75257 and https://www.bluebrixx.com/en/star-trek/104184/Star-Trek-USS-Enterprise-NCC-1701-D-BlueBrixx-Pro :

            The Star Trek looks like the original. I don’t think a bridge would make sense given the scale. If you look at the video, every single dot is a room: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IwxDO2Lrnk

            I’d say there are plenty of details, and ~1.5 as many parts to represent as many features as possible on the model. It doesn’t have any play features, as far as I can tell, but I don’t think that was the goal either. Unlike the LEGO set, it’s a straight-up display model, and it works quite well for that, by my estimate. Again, this is just personal opinion. Everyone should judge for themselves what they like.