King@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWoman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AIwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up155cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up155external-linkWoman’s iPhone photo of son rejected from Sydney competition after judges ruled it could be AIwww.theguardian.comKing@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareentropy@not.alazy.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoWouldn’t the simple use of exif data be able to disprove that? Also the proof of the set, clothes, etc.?
minus-squareAnders429@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoExif data is easily modifiable.
minus-squarevinnymac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYou can modify exif data easily, but yea I think this could be verified in a myriad of ways to legitimize the photo.
Wouldn’t the simple use of exif data be able to disprove that? Also the proof of the set, clothes, etc.?
Exif data is easily modifiable.
You can modify exif data easily, but yea I think this could be verified in a myriad of ways to legitimize the photo.