Even after enabling JS, all I saw waa a white/blank page. They probably want me to enable cookies and/or DOM storage.

  • Slotos@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 months ago

    Welcome to the world of SPAs. Where every little thing needs its own application.

    Damn it, we even have HTML tags that are impossible to employ in their entirety without use of JavaScript. `` is infuriating and is literally two attributes away from not needing JavaScript.

    Except on Chrome. Dialog is broken on Chrome and you will have to clean up with JavaScript after chrome’s own half assed implementation.

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wish every website can works without JS like deep web, no JS, no bullshit, lightweight, just pure HTML/PHP/CSS

  • miss_brainfarts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Every website that does this, repeat after me:

    PROGRESSIVE ENHANCEMENT

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of all the things that might justify needing a SPA framework, serving a page of static news articles is way way down the list.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a transaction- it’s fine from their point of view as they have to pay journalists. Is there and ad- free pay option?

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    tracking, ads, cookies, probably bot detection, too. they want it all running and enabled.

    fuck 'em. on desktop, i just drag over the headline and search via right click menu for an alternate site that re-publishes nyt articles or has one that covers the same thing.

  • normal_user@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow, it turns out I’m not the only person to have ever used “privacy browser”.

    I still have it in case some page has issues with Firefox (probably the issue is not actually with Firefox but with the extensions I installed).

    I only stopped using privacy browser as my daily driver because it uses WebView which is based on the Chromium engine and therefore makes the Chromium monopoly bigger. But it was still a nice browser.