• Zangoose@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think they made patches for ToTK and released them in the early access build before ToTK even launched (the game files leaked online around a week or two before) so Nintendo’s argument was that they were directly promoting and profiting from piracy (different from profiting from legal emulation).

    Luckily because of the way they settled I don’t think this actually implicates any forks that pop up so hopefully projects like suyu and whatever pops up for Citra can still continue development (not a lawyer tho)

    • Smorty [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, I had homebrew at the time and I also played it pre releases so they just let that slip through?

      • Zangoose@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a lot harder to go after homebrew since there isn’t anything directly linking atmosphere/hekate/etc. devs to the promotion of piracy.

        Since the Yuzu team had a whole company formed to manage their patreon funds and were clearly promoting functionality for a game that hasn’t been released yet, they were an easy target for Nintendo. The same thing happened with Team Xecuter’s switch homebrew/mods ages ago.

        If Nintendo had definitive evidence to suggest the Atmosphere devs are profiting off of piracy, they’d do the same thing in a heartbeat. Same with Ryujinx, Luma3ds, or any other form of emulation/homebrew. The only reason they don’t is because they know only way they’d stand a chance in court is if they make it about piracy, copyright protection, and stolen profits.