• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Not that I hold the Lemmy devs in particular high regard, but unless OP is cutting them a check every month enough to pay their full time salaries, I really don’t think that he should be expecting anything just because he faced an issue that was difficult, but (a) not specific to the developers but the admins of the instance and (b) ultimately solvable.

    I also think that this is not a reason to justify a whole fork or even a fully adversarial position. Yeah, tooling for moderation and instance management is lacking, but these can be built on top of the existing codebase. If my fediverser tool does that for user authentication and account management, it could also be extended for content moderation and provide granular access for staff.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      a check every month enough to pay their full time salaries

      I would usually agree because often FOSS projects are used commercially but I don’t think this standard doesn’t apply here because the Lemmy instances are also non-commercial projects.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lemmy instances are also non-commercial projects.

        So why should they be expecting commercial-level support?

        • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          So why should they be expecting commercial-level support?

          “Users should be able to delete stuff they uploaded” is only something for commercial services?