• theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can I just say something super weird? I was recently looking for a solution to an issue I had and I needed to look at an image that I could see clearly so I had to zoom in, but because if I’m in the Reddit website, zooming in actually zooms into the Reddit UI, I did what I used to always do and opened the image in a new tab. No longer does that open the image only. It now opens the image AND some Reddit UI around it so guess what happened when I tried to zoom in? That’s right, I zoomed into the UI so I still couldn’t see the image!!! What the hell, Reddit, it’s almost as if you don’t want people to use your website anymore??

    • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s so you cannot share the image by itself. A static page with .jpg and nothing else won’t have all that sweet tracking and ads that everyone should enjoy.

    • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, I believe that was a change they made not long after shafting 3rd party apps. I had a couple older iOS devices with their own older versions of third party apps, and that change effectively made any post with a Reddit uploaded image unviewable. Incredibly infuriating and I can’t understand the logic behind it either.

      I will say that further to that, a few years ago Imgur made a change that does the same damn thing if it detects you’re on mobile. Unless you tick “Show Desktop Site” in your browser, it’s impossible to actually standalone view a direct image.

      • master5o1@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Presumably to disable that hot linking from other websites/apps. Especially if they use scrapers.

        But yeah, bad ux.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Obfuscating the image file like that is usually completely transparent to scrapers actually, as the image URL is almost always in the HTML. You can find the direct image link yourself if you poke around in the element inspector for a bit.

          It’s just to make it harder to copy and increase to amount of people that link the full site URL (with the tracking and analytics ofc) instead of the image directly.

          • master5o1@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not on desktop so can’t inspect to see the img src.

            But it’s possible for a url in img src to have a different response (ie, html) when it’s a direct navigation (ie new tab).