About 125,000 notices will be sent to high-income earners, including 25,000 people with income more than $1 million, the tax agency said

This is who the Republican party’s complaints about the IRS are intended to protect.

  • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 months ago

    The IRS came after me over the taxes for a couple of grand on a repossessed car that I never got the paperwork on. Apparently I should have just made a few million and not filed at all rather than losing everything I had.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      The issue is these people can afford accountants and other people to draw out and hinder the process. Poor people just have to pay or be held accountable. That’s why low IRS funding hurts poor people and high funding hurts rich people. If they’ve got the money, they can go after the wealthy and, in turn, get even more money from them than they spent to get it.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      So your argument here is they shouldn’t go after those people now? No, I get you’re annoyed that you got fucked in relation to these fucks, but this is a step in the right direction right?

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        7 months ago

        Your reading comprehension is shit. No wonder they say 21% of the USA is illiterate.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, that’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m saying that I was so broke that my car was repossessed and the IRS sees that as me making money. So they billed someone who had literally nothing to their name at the time. Yet due to shit funding they can’t go after millionaires who don’t even fucking file who should be their highest priority because that would bring in both more money for public good and more money for the IRS to go after the bigger fish rather than penny ante bullshit.

        • Djtecha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I agree. They need to be properly funded to go after the rich assholes hiding behind lawyers. The recent funding is a good thing IMHO. Because otherwise the norm is to continue targeting folks like you.

  • Spot@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 months ago

    Sooo… Not only has it not trickled down but, they haven’t even paid their fair share, huh? Who woulda’ thought?!

    • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh come on buddy… It hasn’t trickled down because they haven’t paid their fair share yet! Doubtless the cheque is in the mail and it just got lost for a few years or something; it’ll all start trickling down in no time don’t you worry!!

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s called GOOD BUSINESS! The TRUE Leeches are the SINGLE MOTHERS using FOOD STAMPS to feed their KIDS!

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you’re getting a refund, it’s means you’ve been over paying and giving Uncle Sam an interest free loan.

      I haven’t gotten a (federal) refund in years. Every year I pay at tax time, so that money is sitting in my savings account for the year gaining interest rather sitting in the governments account gaining interest. We aren’t talking a ton of money, but it’s the type of game I can’t help but play if it’s available.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        For the record, if your taxes are higher than a certain number you have to pay it every quarter, otherwise you will owe interest on it at the end of the year. So what EatATaco said is mostly true.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure, I should have made that clear that if you arent close, you’ll pay a penalty.

        • mkrup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Actual CPA here, you’ll owe an underpayment of estimated tax penalty if you don’t pay in at least the lesser of 90% of current year/100% of prior year (110% if AGI >$150K) tax. The penalty is based on the Federal short term rate and prorated based on amount underpaid and time outstanding (i.e. Q1 is overdue for the whole year but only 1/4 of the underpayment, Q4 is the whole amount but only late by one quarter). When all is said and done, it usually works out to like 2% and we have plenty of clients that would rather hold the cash and pay the penalty because it’s generally cheaper than borrowing, or they figure they can get a greater rate of return by interesting it (depending on their situation/perspective).

          If you miss April 15th it goes to credit card rates though (failure to pay penalty, which is very different from underpayment of estimated tax). Don’t do that. Remember: an extension is for time to file, not time to pay.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The super-rich don’t get much of their income from wages, where there is withholding of a bit more than you’re likely to owe if the wages are your only income. They get it from interest, dividends, and running a business. There is usually not withholding for those, so they’re supposed to make quarterly payments. But the Republicans cut IRS funding years ago, so it didn’t have the resources to go after them if they just stopped paying. So a lot did just that.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        People living anywhere less than 10 million aren’t generally living off of dividends though either. Switching to that too soon is a common mistake many of the “merely rich” make.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Sure, but they’re talking about people with income of more than 1 million. If they’re living off interest and dividends, they’ve probably got something in the realm of $30-75 million in assets.