The former president is now highly unlikely to stand trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case before November

The Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a massive victory on Wednesday by agreeing to rule on whether he is immune from prosecution for acts committed while he was president. The court will hear arguments on April 22 and won’t hand down a decision until June — which means it’s unlikely a trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case will commence before the election. If Trump wins the election, he’ll of course appoint an attorney general who will toss the case, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules this summer.

By Wednesday night, Trumpland was celebrating.

“Literally popping champagne right now,” a lawyer close to Donald Trump told Rolling Stone late on Wednesday.

  • pezhore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t matter. He can hold off on liquidation until November and if he wins, (which would mean there’s a strong chance the Senate flips), have his cronies pass a, " lol god emperors don’t pay for summary judgements" bill.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      10 months ago

      No he can’t. The Special Monitor overseeing his assets and watching his books has the authority to start seizing assets until he’s satisfied the monetary requirements to appeal, and she can do that right now. And, there’s interest running on the meter until he does.

      He’s gonna pay whether he likes it or not.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes he can. Unfortunately. We all get to watch this birth of a dictator unfold in slow motion if Trump wins.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          How? Given the powers that the Special Monitor has, how could he possibly avoid paying?

          RNC certainly doesn’t seem like a likely option right now, and nobody else has ponied up the money.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I always figured the Jan 6 ones were a long shot, but these other two cases are done. He’s going to have to pay, and he can’t get an appeal unless he pays, thanks to NY law.

              That’s why it’s different from the federal ones.

              ETA: and he can’t just not pay, because the Special Monitor has a court-ordered obligation to ensure he pays his court debts. She’ll just seize his assets, which she has the power to do.

                • Telorand@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It is different, because he’s not the one with the power over his finances. Having a court-appointed Special Monitor who oversees every financial transaction is not remotely the same as just expecting him to pay out of common decency (which he doesn’t have). Lack of evidence is not evidence of lack.

                  If he becomes dictator, of course it won’t matter, but that’s a future possibility, not a current reality.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t know what she has seized. But that doesn’t mean she hasn’t or won’t. It just means we don’t know.

          But it doesn’t matter what Trump has said publicly, because he’s obligated to pay, and it’s not just up to him or his accountants whether he does.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re operating under the reasonable logic of how this is supposed to work. But nothings gone how it’s supposed to work for Trump. He’s had a decade of very public crime and been found guilty in several different ways, but has so far not had any consequences enforced. guilty of rape, tax fraud, defamation, campaign finance violations, and bribery, and so far not a penny, much less jail time.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I would argue that the two NY cases have gone exactly as you’d expect. Nothing has happened in them that was particularly unusual. Typical rape case + defamation and a corporate fraud case. All already with judgments.

              And as far as collections go, it’s not like buying groceries. He doesn’t have to pay the full amount all at once (and probably can’t). He does have to front the money if he wants to appeal, though, and all he’s done is file for one. They won’t take it up until he’s paid up.

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        and she can do that right now.

        If she hasn’t, then she won’t. We all know what could and should happen, and we all know none of it has.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      He wouldn’t even need to do that. He would just need to sell a few of those Top Secret documents to MBS, and all of a sudden the Trump Org has another 2 billion worth of business in Saudi Arabia