An Illinois state judge on Wednesday barred Donald Trump from appearing on the Illinois’ Republican presidential primary ballot because of his role in the attack at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but she delayed her ruling from taking effect in light of an expected appeal by the former U.S president.

  • RampageDon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong but being removed from the primary ballot has no real standing for general election. It doesn’t matter that he can’t be on the primary when the GOP has chosen him already. It’s just posturing. He hasn’t lost any electoral votes.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re not wrong. However, it’s still massively consequential because if he can be taken off the ballot for the primary, he will also be taken off the ballot for the general. It will be interesting to see how SCOTUS rules. Will they decide to create a new legal test at the federal level? Will they throw it back to Congress? Since they supposedly love states rights so much, will they leave it up to each state to decide?

      Each option is incredibly consequential. Option 1 allows the Supreme Court to disqualify candidates. Option 2 turns it into a political contest, like an impeachment proceeding. Option 3 is absolute chaos, since we know some states will disingenuously retaliate by removing Biden from their ballot regardless of whether there is any merit to an insurrection charge.

      • RampageDon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right. I wasn’t trying to say that this isn’t setting precedent that will help for later rulings. Let’s just not count our chickens before they hatch. Some people are acting like Trump is already down electoral votes because of this, which he isn’t. That’s the only point I was trying to make l.

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      assuming it’s Trump vs Biden in the general

      I was just bored crunching numbers on the ride home but I did say the damn ting

          • RampageDon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I just said I didn’t understand your comment. That was your chance to explain to me what you meant or what I was missing. Instead you turned to insults. So I’ll just assume not only was your comment wrong and you couldn’t explain yourself, you took it personally. That’s all the clarification I needed. Cheers!

            • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You feel insulted because I said you stopped short? It’s the truth. I fully and openly qualified what I said as a projection into the general election. Your comment seemed to be based on everything up to the words “in the general.”

              I’ll switch to insults if that’s what you really prefer.

              • RampageDon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Literally quotes “assuming it’s Trump vs Biden in the general” to try and prove their point no one understands. Then gets mad that the comment after is made about the literal 8 words they quoted as a rebuttal. You are a comical person.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                You’re an odd little monkey. They didn’t say they were insulted, nor did they try to insult you. You’re being overly hostile at not being understood, and honestly I have no idea what you’re trying to say either.