It’s pretty clear he doesn’t have the cash to pay the judgement in full, and will need to sell illiquid assets at a discount in order to pay the full amount.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      If I had an interview with Trump, I wouldn’t go after his big lies. I’d keep hammering away at all the little ones.

      “Who is John Barron?”

      “Who were the detectives you sent to Hawaii to investigate Obama’s birth certificate.”

      “Why did you say you had walked in on the Miss Teen USA contestants?”

      This are three that instantly come to mind, but I’m sure I could find hundreds more

      • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I feel like anytime he’s face with facts, he changes the subject and starts rambling again. Sea lioning Gish Gallop I believe it’s called. Multiple reporters have tried to do what you suggest, but mostly it’s futile. His brain only knows how to construct incoherent rambling and insults.

        One Axios reporter did do a good job once though iirc.

        Edit: Gish Gallop is the term I was looking for, as gracefully pointed out below! Thank you!