• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Except that the jury is not “still out” on number two, it is simply a matter of time, engineering, and training before they are statistically safer than humans.

    Waymo’s cars are already safer than humans in their limited conditions.

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree that they’re already statistically safer in limited conditions; the key part is when/if they will surpass in a wide range of conditions, including heavy snow or the disorganized and often unmarked roads of developing countries, for instance. For what it’s worth, however, I do think the tech will eventually get there.

      • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just an observation, humans aren’t able to navigate heavy snow and disorganized traffic any better. We guess where the road should be, what the conditions are, and where other cars are, and commit with full confidence in our lack of knowledge. It works OK, but there are infinity examples of it not working. Literally any logic behind navigating these scenarios is better that what we can do with our feeble meat suits.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        My only point is that if I’m being super pessimistic about timescales, I’m estimating ~30years for self driving cars to clearly surpass human drivers, and multiple generations before you eliminate human error from dangerously designed roads, to drunk driving, to distracted driving, to sleepy driving etc.