CucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196 · 10 months agoCostly rulelemm.eeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1570
arrow-up1570imageCostly rulelemm.eeCucumberFetish@lemm.ee to 196 · 10 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squaremiss_brainfartslinkfedilinkarrow-up18·10 months agoEh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months agoTurn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
minus-squaremiss_brainfartslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoReflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoI wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
minus-squaremiss_brainfartslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoReflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoI know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
minus-squaremiss_brainfartslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoI think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then
Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
Reflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
I know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then