Pros of golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) replacing all private cars within a city:

  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn’t a viable suburban commuter vehicle, meaning you’ll probably only take it to the nearest transit station
  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn’t likely to kill people
  • Excellent visibility, so less likely to run over children
  • Much smaller and lighter, so building parking garages for park-and-rides would be a lot cheaper and less objectionable than with our current style of cars
  • Electric
  • Smaller batteries than jumbo EVs
  • Compatible with dense, transit-oriented city development
  • Could be installed with mandatory speed limiters

Cons:

  • Less profit for GM and ExxonMobil
  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    6·
    9 months ago

    Sounds similar to a mobility scooter, but more practical for carrying much heavier loads.

    I’d prefer a cargobike personally, but most of the ones I like are too heavy to move when you’re not riding it, let alone with a 1/4 ton load. Those also can’t fit into most apartments, you’ve got to leave them outside or in bicycle storage…

    This kart/NEV thing kind of seems like a good compromise, with quadricycle vans possibly being an alternative option if you aren’t carrying people

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPMEnglish
      4·
      9 months ago

      I agree that a bike is generally preferable, but an NEV seems a good compromise for people who need to move multiple people at once or more cargo than a cargo bike can carry. Max one of these per household + bike for everyone + walkable, transit-oriented development seems like a suitable compromise that would be a significant improvement over the status quo.