• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you can, it’s actually a bad thing because it means the Telco is violating net neutrality by picking and choosing certain traffic to zero-rate.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          It violates the principle and is therefore a bad thing regardless of what the law is.

    • JDubbleu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Glad to help!

      The reason it works is because telecom providers use DNS-based throttling instead of deep packet inspection to selectively limit bandwidth to video sites. They have a massive list of all the popular streaming sites (YouTube, AppleTV, Netflix, etc.) and then throttle the sites in the list. When providers say “unlimited 480p video streaming” they actually have no clue what video quality you are watching. They just pick a bandwidth limitation that would only allow 480p video to play without buffering.

      They could in theory use network traffic analysis to identify video websites which have bursty bandwidth patterns (due to the nature of video buffers), but this would be more difficult, more expensive, and extremely prone to false positives.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      This doesn’t make any sense. Your phone service provider can’t see what you’re doing, but surely they can see how much data you’re using.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        He added more info, is for site/media specific restrictions. Like only 480p video or stuff like that.

        As other said, it doesn’t follow net neutrality but…that depens on country and other stuff.