• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    “We need new technologies that can be controlled by a megacorporation to make a select few rich, not things that individuals can do or use that can break the hold of existing monopolies”

      • Ignisnex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Is nuclear a bad option? Only downsides I’ve heard are basically optics problems. Barring facilities that catastrophically failed on top of horrid safety policy negligence, they seem perfectly suited for baseline power production.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Cost. The reality is nuclear is not just more expensive than every other option, it’s a lot more. I remember seeing something like ten times the cost of solar, per whatever unit of energy

        • Syl@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Cost, where we get uranium, how to handle the wastes. And it may fail even more if we fail to cool it down (less water due to Earth warming up)

      • monobot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Thanks for that thought, I was confused who is arguing so much for nuclear that is not solving anything and is too expensive.

        Shilling makes a lot of sense, but never came to me.

        And downvotes without explanation, even here. I guess normal people are also under influence.