• Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        JJ. But they also released some very specific details such as the name of people exposed and proof of exposure from other sources than talcum powder that was ignored. JJ would be quite liable if they even get a single detail intentionally wrong. I would tend to believe they released accurate details.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeh, sure. Let’s trust the corporation that is discontinuing the sale of talc based baby powder world wide, and is wanting to settle for $9 billion.

          Either JNJ are actually doing the right thing here… or they are cutting losses, protecting themselves, looking after shareholders, whatever.

          Maybe it’s cheaper than trying to recover from such a PR disaster.
          Maybe turns out that cornstarch is cheaper/easier for baby powder, and $9b gets rid of a problem, solves marketing issues of cornstarch, and has long-term savings.

          Maybe I’m wrong and paranoid.
          But I don’t trust JNJ

        • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          ?? You believe a corporation by default is releasing accurate details in the context of clearing themselves of wrong doing?

          That’s every corporation’s first step no matter how incredibly obvious that they are wrong.