Maybe because we “care for each others” opinions. The weird thing about converting instagram users automatically to thread users is, that instagram is mostly a one-to-many communication. One Insta Model posting her newest picture and then thousand others comment and like it. Thread (and Lemmy) are more back and forth and commenting on comments. That means we have an active dialogue where things are discussed in a more natural way. The Insta model does not give a shit about a bi-directional communication with their followers. They prefer a mostly one way communication of send and receive (like or die). They don’t really care for their followers opinions and certainly are not interested in a deeper dialogue with them. They want to expand their reach and likes first of all. Threads is very different in the interaction than instagram.
This is the problem I’ve always had with instragram. For a while I was storing certain pictures on there only because it seemed like a good place to store them that I could share with people if the time ever came for that (it didn’t). The engagement side of things looked very slim.
absolutely. I am in search of peers, not influncers.
I would suspect that most of us on discussion board style platforms (and lemmy in particular) want peer engagement - something that is building quite nicely on lemmy.
This is a good point. It makes me wonder if maybe “engagement” isn’t going to be a metric for whether Threads succeeds or fails. (Other things I have read suggests that it’s hot garbage in ways other than lack of dialogue, so I still think people are dropping it, but they might be able to fix those things).
Maybe because we “care for each others” opinions. The weird thing about converting instagram users automatically to thread users is, that instagram is mostly a one-to-many communication. One Insta Model posting her newest picture and then thousand others comment and like it. Thread (and Lemmy) are more back and forth and commenting on comments. That means we have an active dialogue where things are discussed in a more natural way. The Insta model does not give a shit about a bi-directional communication with their followers. They prefer a mostly one way communication of send and receive (like or die). They don’t really care for their followers opinions and certainly are not interested in a deeper dialogue with them. They want to expand their reach and likes first of all. Threads is very different in the interaction than instagram.
This is the problem I’ve always had with instragram. For a while I was storing certain pictures on there only because it seemed like a good place to store them that I could share with people if the time ever came for that (it didn’t). The engagement side of things looked very slim.
absolutely. I am in search of peers, not influncers.
I would suspect that most of us on discussion board style platforms (and lemmy in particular) want peer engagement - something that is building quite nicely on lemmy.
This is a good point. It makes me wonder if maybe “engagement” isn’t going to be a metric for whether Threads succeeds or fails. (Other things I have read suggests that it’s hot garbage in ways other than lack of dialogue, so I still think people are dropping it, but they might be able to fix those things).