• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    I do. It’s frankly selfish. Having an AI get training on my old comments costs me nothing and it results in the development of useful AI tools. Trying to sabotage that is petty and pointless. It’s not like you could somehow collect the fraction of a pittance that you think you’re owed retroactively. I never commented on Reddit thinking “awesome, I’m going to make bank on the content I’m generating here.”

    People complain about the capitalist mindset of the world and then they do this. Sigh.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 months ago

      I had an 11 year old account that I deleted all my old comments and posts from because of the API debacle. Does that make me selfish that I felt like Reddit wasn’t holding up its end of the unwritten agreement?

      Reddit doesn’t deserve my content anymore than I deserve access from the third party API.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you did it over the API debacle then you’re not one of the people I’m talking about here. This is about people deleting their content to prevent it from being used to train AIs.

        • Voyajer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Do you not remember the real reason why the API debacle happened in the first place was to prepare for this moment? It was always about easy access to training data, third party apps got caught in the crossfire.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            That’s ignoring an awful lot of other considerations. Obviously Reddit hasn’t explained itself in a trustworthy way, but a common belief at the time is that it was to force people to use the official Reddit mobile app so they could be subject to advertising.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s their comment to do with as they see fit. I can’t get mad at them for wanting to erase their presence on a site they don’t use anymore.

    • R00bot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      How is not wanting capitalist companies to profit off of your content not aligned with complaining about the capitalist mindset of the world? Wtf lol.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s the insistence that everything that people do must be compensated with money. People have spent years posting on Reddit for fun, without any thought to being paid for it, and now all of a sudden someone else is making some money so they’re demanding that they should get their slice. And doing what they can to wreck their earlier efforts when they don’t.

        How does Reddit making some money licensing this stuff harm those of us who contributed to it? Is there any problem aside from “I wanna get paid!”?

        • R00bot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why do you think it’s about wanting a slice? They posted on Reddit with no expectation of profit. But they don’t want others to profit off it either. It’s not that complicated.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            But they don’t want others to profit off it either.

            And that’s why I call them selfish. It doesn’t harm them in the slightest if someone else profits off of it.

            • R00bot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              They wouldn’t have posted if they knew this was going to happen. They posted because it was fun, not for this.

              They may be morally opposed to AI (as there are many valid reasons to be opposed to it), or they may just have wanted to have been able to make an informed decision before posting, but by retroactively training the AI on their posts they’ve robbed them of the agency to make that decision.

              That’s why they’re upset.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                They posted content on a website whose user agreement says “we can do whatever we like with the content you post here” and then go surprised-pikachu when the website goes ahead and does whatever they like with the content they posted. Frankly, I’m not tremendously sympathetic. This should have been easy to predict.

                • R00bot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Oh yeah I’m sure you predicted LLMs, and that they would need ridiculous amounts of training data wayyyy back in 2005 when Reddit started lol. Super easy to predict. Good job bud.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      For me it’s a privacy matter. Going through old posts (whether human or machine learning) can nor be used for anything good.

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      What about people who just think “A.I.” Is dog shit and chat bots are a dumb obsession steering the industry in the wrong direction due to hype and money?

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        What about them? I don’t see why they’d care what AI companies are doing in that case. They’d assume they were just wasting money on this stuff.