The method, known as EM Eye, can even capture images through walls, raising huge concerns about the potential for misuse.

The research, led by Kevin Fu, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Northeastern University, targets a vulnerability in the data transmission cables within most modern cameras. These cables unintentionally act as radio antennas, leaking electromagnetic information that can be picked up and decoded to reveal real-time video.

As reported by Tech Xplore, the vulnerability exists because manufacturers focus on protecting the intentional digital interfaces of cameras, such as the upload channel to the cloud, but overlook the potential for information leakage through accidental channels. “They never intended for this wire to become a radio transmitter, but it is,” Fu explains. “If you have your lens open, even if you think you have the camera off, we’re collecting.”

Cross post from https://lemmy.world/post/12081766

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, unless you’re actually somebody important, it’s incredibly unlikely something like this is going to be used against you. So those covers are just more annoying than anything.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          It does take a little effort at a minimum, however, when compared to the relative real world risk it’s purely wasted. Unless of course, you’re a politician or maybe important executive for a major company.

          Keep your shit updated, ad blocking and no installing shady shit will lockout the lowest common denominator “hackers” (AKA script kiddies). All those scary articles about super advanced techniques? Yea, hackers with real skills can implement them and do some wicked shit, but they DGAF about Joe Schmo’s jack off session, they’re doing shit like targeting companies, politicians, celebrities etc things that can get them $$$$

          It’s pointless, it’s security theater that you’ve imposed on yourself and yet I’m sure you’ve complained about the pointless and annoying TSA as security theater…

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh so you’re pulling the “I have nothing to hide because I’m just a normal boring person” argument. Guess you need a physical person stalking you for you to understand.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re having the same mistake as the people who say “it doesn’t matter because I got nothing to hide.”

            The point of privacy is that you have control over what you want to share with others vs what you prefer to keep to yourself, be it for legal, religious or personal reasons.

          • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s pretty disgusting how many people in this tread are actively promoting weak digital security practices with laziness as the justification and how little you actually understand about data theft.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      I actually use the cameras on pretty much all my devices, so disabling them would be a problem.

    • Psiczar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The article includes dashcams and home security cameras, I definitely cover those with tape.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Almost no one even understands how to take digital security seriously, and get angry when you try to help them.

      I mean just look at your up/dowvote ratio.

      Full disclosure: Am an IT professional with 3 decades of experience. Every camera device I have has a cover, either that came with the device, or one that I made.

      Remember that huge fiasco with the schools that were spying on kids bedrooms at night?

      Yeah, that tells you all you need to know about how trustworthy any camera is.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          is it tho. if your phones cams are not coincidentally covered by tables or the fabric of your pocket, where are they pointing, genius?

          for most regular people, like me, covering them is pointless. the security measures in place are not perfect, but sufficient. someone who goes over the top to circumvent them will find he just gets to see a regular person doing regular things.

          • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is a significant possibility that within the next 10 years any western nation can go full authoritarian.

            You will laugh naively and say that it won’t happen. And it is because of sentiments like this that we have a twice impeached fascist who idolizes shitler on the ballot for president later this year.

            So can you imagine your country, with an authoritarian government in power with the ability to spy on literally every citizen?

            Can you imagine that authoritarian government ‘disappearing’ dissidents based on their social media participation?

            If you can answer yes to this, then you understand why it is CRITICAL to control every aspect of your identity exposure?

            My phones front and back cams are covered with a clip until I want to use them. And that’s not even the beginning of what I do to limit my online profile.

            • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              you’re talking about the problems of a possible future, but taking non-preventative measures against it right now that are useless (for me and other regular people) right now.

              if the dark future you’re describing becomes reality, i will gladly put a sticker on my phones cam, so the spy in the hallway can’t see your chin when you sit near my coffee table

              • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The risk of exposure is great enough that if the chances were only 1% it would still be worth minimizing your online profile.

                You can choose to wait until it is too late and I will have zero sympathy.