• Ganondorf@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Apple doesn’t give a shit. Any time a corporation “cares” it’s for money-making potential only. Starbucks abandoned Pride as soon as it could have affected their profit margins.

    • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Starbucks abandoned pride at least partially because people were getting assaulted. I agree about performative capitalism but it’s a little different.

      • Ganondorf@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m sure there could be some level of implied safety in the reasoning, but a local Starbucks was shut down “due to violence near the location” and when the staff were interviewed by local news about the closure they made 2 points: a) they had no idea what “violence” corporate was talking about b) it coincided with multiple stores being closed due to the possibility of unionizing, which that store apparently had been discussing.

        Starbucks pulled back Pride right about the same time as Bud Lite taking a sales hit for supporting LGBT. Target did something similar. Seems a little too coincidental, but that’s just my opinion based on the factors at play.

        • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing about it, though… all the pride merch, lattes, beers were not because the corpos care if your lgbtq and being disenfranchised and harassed and all that.

          They just wanted to sell more merch and lattes and beers. “Slap a rainbow on it- they will eat it up!” Was literally their thought process.