• GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 months ago

      The internet should be entirely decentralized. We have the technology.

        • itslilith
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not nearly as much as it should be. In many places certain ISPs have near monopolies over internet access, and domains and dns used on the web are managed by ICANN. Sure, there’s alternatives to that, but barely anyone knows or uses them

            • PHLAK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              I understand what you’re saying but it feels wrong to lump Cloudflare in with Google and Amazon. Clouflare, thus far anyway, has been mostly a force of good for the internet.

              • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                So was Google in its first decade or so. Hell, I’ll even grant that AWS, GCP and k8s have been mostly benevolent. But these parties becoming near monopolies for hosting or routing is costing a price of centralization.

          • PHLAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Companies having a geographic monopoly over access to the internet doesn’t change the fact that the Internet as a whole is decentralized.

            That being said, yes, something should be done about ISPs.

    • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Won’t they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn’t you agree ?

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don’t see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

      • eating3645@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        9 months ago

        ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about that.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 months ago

          Exactly. They’re getting massive handouts from our money. Let’s cut out the middlemen and pay a utility directly.

      • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        9 months ago

        What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone’s rates regardless.

      • marx2k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          9 months ago

          They also tend to deliberately stay out of each other’s service areas so they can ramp up prices with de facto local monopolies.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

        • red_pigeon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

          Where I’m from if it goes public I’m sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it’s private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it’s expensive. It’s a choice between the lesser of two evils.

          • rusticus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        I guess to answer that, wonder if your water, electric, or waste companies are gouging you. If they are, like in Texas, then yeah maybe?

        Everywhere I lived, people and voting have strong control over utilities and they are fairly priced because it’s a service not a business

      • Montagge@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Where I use to live was all private. CenturyLink was the only option as they had an agreement with Comcast that Comcast wouldn’t come into my area.

        I paid $60/month for 500kbps down. Yes kilobits.

    • Bocky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The internet is free and public. You can go to any mcdonalds and go all the internetting you want. At home, its all the buried cabled that have to be checked on and maintained that you have to pay for.