• cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hardly the only two countries. In the US it’s only masked by immigrants. Fertility is even coming down in most parts of the third world.

    It’s mainly attributable to women’s improved education, career prospects, and access to contraception, plus declining infant mortality. Every single one of these factors is a good thing, but the combination of them will lead to a global demographic crunch over the next century.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I disagree with your statement that it’s “masked” by immigrants - I think immigration is a legitimate solution… but I don’t disagree with your causes - especially wealth inequality/declining career prospects for everyone.

      This must come as a surprise to “pro-family” conservatives but being ground into dust by your employer doesn’t really get the mojo flowing.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          If all countries go below replacement levels we’ll be in a wonderful position because we’ll be able to feed and provide for everyone. That’s a looong way off though.

          • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Not necessarily. Pension systems will be strained, many economies of scale might break down, infrastructure might become too expensive to maintain with reduced taxpayer funding. Most young people will work to support old people leaving little leftover economic potential for anything else.

            A lot of people think that we can solve it with automation, but initial investment required to do that might become too expensive before it becomes necessary.