• HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    squatters rights precede the founding of the United States and have nothing to do with renters rights. You’re just wrong about why these laws exist.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re talking like a Sovereign Citizen.

      I’m talking about the very specific laws that prevent people from being evicted if they’ve been residing on a property for N months without following a very deliberate and drawn out legal procedure so that landlords cannot evict a family from their home of many years because of some missed rent payments or because they want to upgrade the place so they can charge more to a new tenant. Those are the laws that keep the sheriffs from just kicking down doors, at least in some states.

      I’m not taking a moral position on squatting. My friends and I squatted in an abandoned house while I was in high school, although most of us didn’t live there full time. If I noticed someone squatting tomorrow, especially in a corporate owned home, I would not have seen it. But the laws that I’m talking about were designed to protect tenants from having their lives unfairly disrupted, and I’m arguing that even if people are against squatters, we still need to protect tenants’ rights.

      I would have thought that was abundantly clear.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Precede

      Bet… but the issue is the government who currently controls the land and enforces the laws.

      You don’t go breaking Constantinople’s laws because they were once different in Istanbul.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’ve been handed context so you don’t have to hurt your silly little wrists typing. does the comment make sense now?

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            no. the governments that currently control the several states actually all have squatters rights (adverse possession) laws still on the books. the person to whom i was replying was conflating squatters rights with renters rights.

            your comment seems to imply that somehow the squatters rights were eliminated at some point, but they never were.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              no

              Okay, here is a link to the wiki page for the original song from 1953, and here is a yt link to a modern cover you’ve probably heard.

              And finally, here is a short history of the cultural shift from the 15th century the song is referencing. The name finally changed in the 1930s hence the cultural relevance of the song in the 1950s.

              I hope that helps with the reference. Have a great evening!

              • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

                here

                Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

                I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes it is, I mixed up the names. Go figure a guy tries to reference a song from 70 years ago about a governmental shift from 570 years ago got the details wrong lol.

          So sorry to wrack your noggin. I’ll put it in a simpler way;

          When in Rome, do as the Romans do.