So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

  • kirklennon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US)

    You can definitely fire someone for being a sex offender in the US. Outside of a few exceptions that probably don’t apply in your case, you can also fire someone for being merely an accused sex offender.

    You can also fire someone for laughing in a weird way, or wearing a color you don’t like, or being born on a Monday when you don’t like Mondays.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Many US based companies also do pre-employment background checks. So either OP works for a company that doesn’t or they work for a “second chance” company that is OK with violent backgrounds. Either way the company is fine with his background and is very unlikely to fire him for something they likely knew about at hire.

    • Xtallll
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      In the US you can be fired for any reason except for protected reasons (gender, sexuality, race, religion). Being a convicted sex offender is not a protected class.

      • Xariphon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        In an at-will state, which I think is most or all of them.

        Right-to-work is different; it means you can’t be required to join a union in order to take a job.

      • tjhart85@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        In a right to work stste

        Some cities and counties have additional protections, but at the state level, the only one that’s not at-will is Montana and the entire population of that state would fit in a single decently sized city. So, I think that’s a distinction that wasn’t really necessary, but you do you.