• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    So the car’s presence was annoying them. That’s not exactly a great justification for torching it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      The car shouldn’t have been present in the first place. It wasn’t a place for cars to be at that moment.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If you were to turn down the wrong street, maybe park in the wrong spot, you’d consider it reasonable if a mob torched it?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty sure I’m not a self-driving car. I’m also pretty sure if I saw a big crowd of people, I wouldn’t keep driving forward.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I didn’t say they’d torch you. The scenario can include them graciously allowing you to depart your car before they burn it to the ground.

            Seriously, you think it’s reasonable for a mob to destroy a car because its presence “triggered frustrations in the crowd”? Bear in mind this isn’t France we’re talking about, where torching cars to express frustration is part of the common culture. This is San Francisco.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think it’s reasonable for a mob to destroy one of the many self-driving cars that have been pissing off San Francisco residents for a very long time now when it tries to drive into them during a big celebration where cars weren’t even supposed to be.

              Who got hurt here? Waymo? Fuck Waymo.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Alright, so you’re fine with mobs destroying the property of anyone that “pisses them off.” I’d say that’s a slippery slope, but you’re already basically at the bottom.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’m fine with mobs destroying something that has been a public menace for years.

                  Why are you making personal attacks? I did not attack you. Are you able to carry out a conversation with someone you’re disagreeing with and not make personal attacks?

                  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    What personal attacks? I’m giving you ample opportunity to clarify your position on this matter, and it keeps ending up in support of mob violence and lawlessness. I think that’s a terrible position to take, but that’s an attack on the position, not the person.