• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m simultaneously amused and appalled.

    The amusement is from the Taliban being so sensitive they can’t even allow a domain with ‘queer’ in the name to be associated with .af as if anyone anywhere outside maybe Afghanistan itself associates .af with Afghanistan.

    The reason I’m appalled should be obvious.

  • Kabaka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have two .af domain names that got suspended as well. I don’t even think they had a single DNS record set right now, but I had short-term plans for them. Oh well.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Firstly, the domain was seized, the instance remains though is effectively orphaned due to how instances work. You should change your title to “queer.af domain seized from mastodon instance by Taliban” to make things clearer.

    Secondly, you seem to be under the impression there’s some sort of way around this? A TLD controlled by a foreign government (whether you like it or not) retook a domain. It’s similar to the US having control of .us or Canada having control of .ca.

    So to make things fun, I’ll point out that yes, technically it is possible to “work around” the issue and keep the domain name. Notice I said, and stressed, the word “technically”. Because you likely have a better chance of Trump admitting to a crime and voluntarily going to jail than it happening.

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s got nothing to do with Mastodon. Mastodon did not “comply” because Mastodon has no say one way or the other.

          Where TLDs are associated with particular countries then the national registrar for that country controls who is allocated domains under it.

          Example: ‘.fr’ is associated with France and is controlled by a French organisation.

          ‘.af’ is similarly controlled by an Afghanistan organisation and they can choose to grant or revoke ownership of domains under that TLD however they like.

          The Mastodon instance will need to move to a new domain.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              9 months ago

              The national top-level domains are MEANT to be controlled by their relevant nation-states. They are not intended to be part of vanity URLs.

              So there’s nothing to “fix” here. This is the system working as intended, basically.

              • rdyoung@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                9 months ago

                This right here. I believe Vanuatu recalled all theirs not long ago. The average person can still register plenty of country tlds but if you do, be aware and ready for the day it gets recalled.

            • tiramichu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Some amount of centralisation in domain management is necessary, in order to agree who owns what.

              Devolving control of TLDs to respective nations was actually a GOOD idea because it means each country can operate those TLDs in a way that fits their needs, which is already much better than all global TLDs being operated by a single organisation.

              The main mistake is that queer .af chose to register a domain controlled by a government who was very likely to have problems with what they were using it for.

              Nowadays there are a large number of ‘new’ TLDs which are not nationally controlled and may be a better choice.

              • rdyoung@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Countries only control the tlds that represent them, af for Afghanistan, co.uk (obvious) .us (obvious), etc. The rest like the standard com, net, info and the others recently added like taxi, xyz, vip, etc are controlled by icann.org. Plenty of country tlds are freely available for anyone to use but buyer beware, there is precedent for a country to pull those domains back and not let others use them anymore.

              • i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                another issue is migrating accounts losses post history.

                Is there really no way to keep post history with same instance new domain name?

            • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              This is the internet equivalent of choosing to open a gay bar in Kabul instead of San Francisco.

              There were plenty of safe spaces, they chose terribly.

            • rdyoung@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The only ones subject to state power are the tlds that represent countries or states, counties, etc. The other tlds are controlled by another central body that isn’t connected to any country and it would take a judge ordering a seizure for a domain to be taken down.

              Basically if they had gone with any of the other shit ton of tlds that aren’t for a specific country they would still be up and running. I can’t say that I wouldn’t have grabbed that tld given the chance but knowing it was Afghanistan I wouldn’t have used that as my main domain.

        • rdyoung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not how that works. Domains are registered and basically rented year by year from registrars and they seized it from them.

          Mastodon has nothing to do with it. Mastodon is like lemmy, anyone can run their own instance. For example I have a ton of domains, most notably to go along with my username I’ve “owned” rdyoung.info for like 20 years now. I could run my own instance and point that domain at it or the other ones I own.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          the morons who registered teh domain, signed it over to the government ‘for safe keeping’ and then the government turned into the literal taliban.

          dont sign your domains over to some foreign power or youre gunna have a bad time

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Probably something to do with .af being the domain for Afghanistan. Wouldn’t be the first country to seize something with their domain that they didn’t like.