“This ‘groundbreaking’ AI proposal that they gave us yesterday, they proposed that our background performers should be able to be scanned, get one day’s pay, and their companies should own that scan, their image, their likeness and should be able to use it for the rest of eternity on any project they want, with no consent and no compensation. So if you think that’s a groundbreaking proposal, I suggest you think again.”

  • dudebro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Poverty in America is nothing compared to poverty in Africa, or most parts of the world.

    Ironic how you say I’m the one speaking from a position of privilege.

    On the children starving in the US, it’s usually because parents are struggling to pay rent. Rent goes up when they make more money. The system is designed to keep people barely alive so they’re in no position to change it. Just work and pay bills till you literally can’t do it anymore.

    I think the US should have universal healthcare, so I’m not sure what your point on cancer is.

    I’m not going to argue the person worth $9k in the US should make more money just so it can be funneled to landlords and executives. I’m going to argue landlords and executives should be making less profit so those with less money can be catered to as well. The only way they’ll make less if they’re forced to, and that involves spreading out away from the most expensive places to live. Not “making more money.” All the latter does is drive up inflation, which is what we’re seeing now.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironic how you say I’m the one speaking from a position of privilege.

      You clearly are.

      And it doesn’t matter what America should have. We are talking about America as it is now. And, based on your logic, anyone in America today with a long term or chronic disease that can’t afford to pay for it should just die. Their family has no right to complain that they can’t afford care.

      They also have no right to complain, according to you, if they can’t afford electricity or plumbing.

      If you can’t afford electricity, plumbing or healthcare, how is your life different from people living in poverty in Africa? What is the effective difference? Other than, according to you, having no right to complain.

      • dudebro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, that’s where the irony comes from. You think poverty in America is comparable to poverty in Africa.

        It does matter what American’s ‘should have.’ You’re trying to argue they ‘should have’ more money. I’m arguing they should have to pay less.

        Here you go saying ‘x doesn’t have a right to complain.’ I told you before, everyone has a right to complain about anything. It’s called freedom of speech and I support it.

        If you can’t afford any of that stuff in the US, there are plenty of social programs to help you out that you will not get in Africa. The fact you’re trying to conflate the two just speaks to your position of privilege. You really don’t know how bad things are outside of the US.

        If you can’t afford food in the US, we have EBT. If you can’t afford housing, we have government assisted housing that can literally cover your expensive apartment rent.

        If you can’t afford that stuff in Africa or most of the world, you die of starvation and suffer from exposure. Not to mention that being in a nation of excess also results in a higher quality of life all around you, such as from the infrastructure you benefit from. You can wash your face in a McDonald’s, that’s better than the slumwater of Burundi.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          there are plenty of social programs to help you out that you will not get in Africa.

          Such as? Which ones do all people in poverty qualify for? If that’s true, why do people live in shacks without electricity or running water? Do they choose to live that way for the fun of it? Is this one of those “they need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps” thing?

          And if people don’t have the right to complain, I guess the actors have the right to do what they’re doing and you have no point.

          • dudebro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I edited my previous post to highlight the benefits of social programs in the US.

            I never said the actors don’t have a right to do what they’re doing. My point was, from the beginning, that they will get no sympathy from me for doing it. Why does that bother you so much?

            • dudebro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And yes, believe it or not, some people do choose to live in shacks without any electricity or running water.

              In fact, everyone I met living that lifestyle was doing it because of choice (or mental health, but it’s a different discussion to identify which.)