A lot of debate today about “community” vs “corporate”-driven distributions. I (think I) understand the basic difference between the two, but what confuses me is when I read, for example:

…distro X is a community-driven distribution based on Ubuntu…

Now, from what I understand, Ubuntu is corporate-driven (Canonical). So in which sense is distro X above “community-driven”, if it’s based on Ubuntu? And more concretely: what would happen to distribution X if Canonical suddeny made Ubuntu closed-source? (Edit: from the nice explanations below, this example with Ubuntu is not fully realistic – but I hope you get my point.)

Possibly my question doesn’t make full sense because I don’t understand the whole topic. Apologies in that case – I’m here to learn. Cheers!

  • kool_newt@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure if any Suse would fit in there. I’d say more Arch, Debian, Slackware (is that a thing anymore?), Gentoo, Linux From Scratch if you count that as a distro.

    • nan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

        • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed! @NaN if you have any links or references where I can read more about this interesting relationship, feel free to share.(Cool username by the way.)