After Alabama was ordered to redraw their Congressional maps, Republicans are facing potential loss of some seats in the House.

  • TheDogAndTheDragon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This would only be at the next election right? So it would just make the split more “fair” for what the population in general wants. But the House does tend to go for the winning candidate’s Party during a Presidential election year I think.

    • RedPander@lemmy.rogers-net.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another issue is timing. State(s) could drag their feet in redistricting and if it gets too close to the election say they don’t have time to complete the courts request. I hope there’s timeliness enforced.

      Also, yes usually the house goes to the winning candidate for the first two years than swaps.

        • taj@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup. That’s the way the Ohio ‘non-gerrymandering’ law was written. Just drag your feet long enough, and it goes back to the (Republican-leaning) legislature. And then just drag their feet long enough, and those maps get used regardless of legality (they were ruled illegal… 2, 3x over by the state Supreme Court, but no matter!)

        • taj@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup. That’s the way the Ohio ‘non-gerrymandering’ law was written. Just drag your feet long enough, and it goes back to the (Republican-leaning) legislature. And then just drag their feet long enough, and those maps get used regardless of legality (they were ruled illegal… 2, 3x over by the state Supreme Court, but no matter!)