• GreyBeard@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    They and Microsoft are a smart investment for now. They could end up like a lot of company post COVID bump, but both are old companies that hopefully have the smarts to project and plan to so they don’t collapse when the cash stops flowing as well.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I dunno man. I just don’t get it. Any of it.

      Like there was a Chevy dealer with a ChatGPT chatbot and they had to take it down within days because it was just immediately being abused. It couldn’t even answer any simple questions that I asked. It was nothing but a liability.

      Many other bots are neutered to the point of being completely useless.

      Not to mention the looming issue of whether any of this will even legally be allowed to exist.

      • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree that these customer service bots are a poor use of the tech. In the corporate world, it is very useful for both writing and summarizing, that’s where Microsoft comes in. Outside of LLMs, though, NVIDIA is well staged for most AI stuff. That’s why I say they will outlast the craze. It doesn’t matter what the AI is used for, NVIDIA wins. Voice to text, text to voice, sentiment analyses, object and image recognition, anomaly detection. All of which have gotten significantly better in the last few years due to modern AI tech. Hell, even video game up-scaling and ray tracing have both benefited from these technologies.

        All of that is to say, the LLMs and image generation stuff has taken all the press and attention, but there are a lot more uses than those two, and clever people are finding new uses constantly.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          useful for both writing and summarizing

          Voice to text, text to voice, sentiment analyses, object and image recognition, anomaly detection.

          All of this seems like not super valuable stuff. Especially considering the current state of AI.

          The most valuable application I can see is as a sort of “assistant”. One that can answer calls, take messages, draft emails, create and add appointments to your calendar, etc. MS is doing it the right way by creating an entire OS around it. But not having a mobile OS will hamstring them considerably.

          Google and Apple hold all the cards right now, for that reason. Apple has the on-device processing power. Google has the professional ecosystem.

          Hell, Google’s Messages spam filter is the only reason I still have a Google account.

          But again, I’m still not confident these things are as valuable as the attention they receive makes them out to be.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        My wife needed help with an Excel VBA script. I know programming but not VBA. I spent hours searching with Google to find a script that I could adapt. I gave up and tried ChatGPT. It wrote a working VBA program in seconds.

        A friend is a sales engineer. He says he spends days putting together customer requirements with technical specs into a coherent proposal for government sales. He said he tried chatgpt and it gave him a complete proposal in seconds. He said he had to proofread it but that was hours instead of days of work. He (the company he works for) won the multi million dollar bid.

        It’s not human intelligence that will solve all the world’s problems. But it is a revolutionary assistant like how the pocket calculator improved productivity compared to adding numbers by hand.