• Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    The weight is never exact, buy a few packages and see if the are within a standard deviation of the listed weight.

    • penguin_knight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      confused by this.

      to calculate a standard deviation OP would have to buy a few packets anyways.

      if you maybe wanna buy 100 to find what the standard deviation is, by definition, only 68% of them will be within a standard deviation (assuming the weights are normally distributed)

      • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Usually foods are regulated that the standard deviation falls within some range of grams. Sorry if I was unclear.

  • Mpatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    You gota report that to the consumer goods or something like. They can get fined very big deneros for selling under weight goods. Like it’s a realy big deal.

    • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      no, product weight

      if it is liquid it should have gross and net. packaging never counts as product weight…yet

            • Dabundis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s actually more likely that it wasn’t printed for the US market (pasta in the US is most commonly sold in packages of 1 pound/453g), but that brand of pasta does sell to a US market which subjects them to US regulations. It seems weird to me that they would go through the effort of cheating on packaging only in some markets.

              It’s a lot more likely that the pictured disparity is caused by a combination of (1) the 410g figure being a nominal value with an accepted error margin, and (2) home kitchen scales not being the most precise instruments.

              • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s actually more likely that it wasn’t printed for the US market

                The English-French bilingual packaging suggests this particular box was sold in Canada (although the brand isn’t familiar to me). I’m sure we have some similar law, though.

        • Che Banana@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because

          The FPLA relates to the net quantity of contents information on packages, goods, or commodities that are sold on the basis of weight or measure (i.e., it does not apply to such products as electronic or industrial equipment that have contents sold by the quantity of their contents and appliances

          https://www.nist.gov/standardsgov/compliance-faqs-packaging-and-labeling-us#2

          Not trying to be snarkey but it literally was a 2 second search. There are laws against this, and it used to be standard practice to put a small amount more than actual weight (volume) listed bit now it seems they stopped giving a shit and dare you to question or sue them into compliance.