• cadekat@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like this is absolutely an appropriate response. A really shitty boss would sue or fire them for cause. Chiding them is pretty dang tame.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t (successfully) sue someone for quitting and you can’t fire them when they have already quit.

        • Drusas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have never heard of notice being in a contract. I’m sure it’s a thing, but it’s very uncommon.

          • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t know where you all work. But over here it is standard even for ‘unqualified’ work to have at least 1 month notice. For both sides. This gives employers and employees some time to find something new.

            • Drusas@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m speaking for the United States, minus Montana (if I recall correctly).

              Neither employers nor employees are required to give notice. However, it is standard practice that employers do not give notice and employees do (usually two weeks).

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            When I worked at a callcenter they offered a new contract trading an agreement to give 2 weeks notice for a better paid vacation plan, with the consequence of failing to give notice being that the any unpaid pay periods would be paid at the minimum legal wage (which is of course a very pitiful wage I might add)