‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
‘…(he) claimed that prosecutors have no evidence against him and that there is a political conspiracy to silence him. He was previously banned from various prominent social media…’
Am I the only one here old enough to realize 12 years ago this argumentation chain would have been hilarious?
Not that I support human trafficking, but damn news writers nowadays are at the very best lazy as shit.
What’s the argument here?