Reddit users thevincentasteroid and MMD3_ posted about an auto-playing video ad (with sound) on the home screen. The ad is for Chicken Tender Wraps from Carl’s Jr. When it begins auto-playing, it pushes all the other UI elements out of focus and goes almost full-screen, returning to the home screen after it has played through once.

  • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nope.

    That’s just how the ad at the top looks and always has, and yes, it plays if you hover over it, they always have, and yes, it expands out if you keep watching it and don’t touch anything.

    If you use the UI normally the ad doesn’t play, the person in that video explicitly played the ad.

    plays ad

    ad plays

    SurprisedPikachu.jpeg

    Get this clickbait shit outta here. It’s literally an ai generated article that stole content off a reddit post as it’s “source”. Have some standards people.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿
      link
      fedilink
      English
      855 months ago

      Why the fuck are there ads at all?? The advertisement did exactly as the article says it does – it autoplays full screen if you cursor over the fucking advertisement.

      Not clickbait at all.

      • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        You have to cursor over it for several seconds and click nothing before it plays, you have to intentionally opt into triggering it.

          • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 months ago

            Well the issue with what the above poster described is Samsung TV litters the autoplay on everything, so you feel like you are playing minesweeper trying to find somewhere you can leave the cursor without triggering an autoplay.

            At least on the CCwGTV there’s just the one big ad at the top, but everything else is a “safe” zone to leave the cursor, abd the cursor starts out default on the app row.

            Also, CCwGTV allows you to just switch to a different launcher (without ads) entirely if you wish.

            I have this issue with Netflix’s app, pretty much every tile will loudly autoplay if you don’t touch the cursor for a second, taking over the screen. You have to hit the back button to pop-up the settings menu to stop that from happening otherwise you’ll walk away from your TV with some random 10s trailer playing on loop forever while you deal with something.

        • @player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I use a Chromecast with Google TV everyday and I do not receive autoplay ads on the home screen. You are free to disable ads on the home screen in the settings and you are free to install third party home screens.

          In fact, the only interaction with the home screen that is required is when I see it briefly before pressing the Netflix button on the remote which I have remapped to Plex or jellyfin using the button mapper app.

          Even with the default home screen you do not see auto play ads unless you select them and continue watching.

            • @player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Yes, there is an app called Button Mapper that allows you to map any button to any app, even special functions and utilities. It also allows for special behavior when double clicking or long pressing.

    • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      705 months ago

      As an AppleTV user I’m honestly shocked folks are ok with their product they paid for having advertisements on it like that anyways?

      It’s one thing to advertise a show or an app / service that is in the App Store but another to show actual ads.

      It’s weird to me.

      Then again, you and your advertisement ID are googles business.

      • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        205 months ago

        We are not okay with it.
        But else you have this, some flavor of AndroidTV + Launcher, an AppleTV which probably doesnt have feature parity with all apps available for the AndroidTV or you setup your own device which involves (probably) work.

        • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          95 months ago

          I’m not sure what app feature parity you are talking about, unless it’s a specific application for android(?)

          For what it’s worth the Apple ecosystem is the “popular/trendy” one and businesses will cut their balls off to have their app work well on Apple stuff. I say that entirely from a “Apple is the zeitgeist” not one is better than the other standpoint.

          • Fushuan [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            65 months ago

            Lmao no. The apple ecosystem is not the popular/trendy one, it’s the expensive one where devs must pay a license to publish their apps. There’s tons of open source apps that publish to the play store but don’t publish in the apple store because it costs them money to do so. I use several apps that don’t have parity in ios. TachiyomiSY, Wow (weather app that apparently was published to the iPad store, not the iPhone store…, it has no ads, customizable interface and it can connect to the local weather provider which is usually the most accurate), Notify (app that let’s me configure extra stuff on my MiBand), Boost (no, voyager’s interface sucks for me), newpipe(! There’s a newpipe in ios but it’s another app and has ads lmao).

            Basically, if you want popular brand company apps, sure, they will be on ios, but I bet you they will be on android too, if not earlier because it’s free to publish and nowadays if we are honest you can develop a single app with react native and voilà, make it into a functional app in both systems with minimal effort. However, the difference exists on the open source apps, on the small apps created by small devs that offer stuff for free, those don’t publish into apple because it would cost them 99 USD per year just to be able to publish.

            • @Clent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              No, that would allow someone to take over the device.

              However, it does wake up to whatever app was last running so the difference is likely semantic.

              Mine are always in the Plex app, even on TVs that have Plex apps because they cannot return to the exact same Plex screen.

              It’s weird that people are dropping hundreds or thousands on a tv only to cheap out on the device they are presumably using to stream their pirated content.

              I have Apple TVs that have outlived their original TVs. From what I’m reading here many people are on their third or fourth chrome cast. Silly.

              • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                The earlier CCs were slow and/or had less features.
                Sorry but I don’t like being stuck at 720p.

                Also they are very cheap so replacing them is hardly of any value and you can still gift them to anyone else in need.

          • @normalexit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            The only app I’ve run into without an official Apple TV flavor is Jellyfin, but there are two alternatives in the app store.

            Unsure if there is anything like new pipe that can eliminate YouTube ads on Apple TV but that’s really nice too.

          • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            What I meant with parity was the app catalogue.
            For example some (F)OSS devs may only be available for AndroidTV.

            Maybe not officially in the store but you can still sideload them to some extent.
            Is that even possible for devices like the AppleTV?

                • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  We’ve been able to sideload on iOS for quite some time.

                  There have been jailbreaks (equivalent to a root) for iOS devices for quite some time, newer devices take more time to break but it always gets there.

                  There is a lot of misunderstanding and tech bro tribalism around android and Apple that makes folks blind to what the other has and does

                  further driving this tribalism is how my iPhone auto capitalizes Apple and iPhone properly but happily ignores chrome and android and google

      • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        I don’t even notice it, the ad starts out small at the top and your cursor starts out on the Apps row, you have to very intentionally trigger the ad.

        90% of the time the ads are for movies or TV shows on the streaming services you have installed (and presumably an account for) anyways, so there’s been non zero times where I did go abd hover the ad to watch it cuz I was like “oh hey I actually wanna watch that, is it coming out soon? No shit!”

        The other 10% if the time it’s mcdonalds or Harvey’s or whatever, I barely notice it as I spend pretty much all of my time with the Google tv “inside” an app.

        Very little time gets spent on the home screen, it’s a glorified Start menu to pick an app and open it up, so I don’t, to be blunt, give much of a shit that for half a second I can see a big Mac at the top of my TV screen before I click the 1 button to open Netflix.

        Also more often than not I use my phone app to push to the TV, so my process is:

        1. TV is turned off atm, I open on my phone (Netflix, Disney plus, crunchyroll, Amazon prime, YouTube, etc)

        2. I click the cast button on my phone

        3. TV auto detects activity, starts turning on, meanwhile my chromecast is already loading up the app and booting into it

        4. By the time my TV screen flips on, the app is opened as well and my content starts to play, so u never even saw the home screen in the first place

        End result: I rarely even see the app realistically anywho.

      • @Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        A single apple TV is like $80 more than Google TV devices to do the same thing. I don’t like the ads and they irritate me, but I have 4 TVs with streaming boxes (so I don’t have to replace the screens. I’m not paying an extra $360 just to not have ads on the home screen.

        It’s just a situation where I’m not really okay with either option.

      • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        It’s one thing to advertise a show or an app / service that is in the App Store but another to show actual ads.

        Most of the time it’s this, rarely mcdonalds or Harvey’s has an ad like this you need to hover over for several seconds to play, intentionally, and people turn it into rage bait garbage posts.

        90% of the time it’s just an add for a TV show or movie, and you still have to purposefully hover over it unmoving to start it playing, it’s pretty opt in.

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        I have an android tv from Sony which is basically android tv without any kind of skin AFAIK. No ads. I had suggested videos from apps and stuff but hat was configurable and removed years ago.

    • @fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      When you say it always has worked this way what is your frame of reference regarding time? I haven’t owned a chromecast in about 6 years. However prior to that chromecast had no ads whatsoever so the idea that there are ads at all is shocking to me. It certainly hasn’t always been this way. (I currently use an Apple TV)

      • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        I bought the Chromecast with Google TV (older version, not the newer 4k one, which I also own now) when it first cane out.

        The home screen hasn’t changed since day 1 when I plugged it in.

        It always had an ad at the top, and you always have had to purposefully move the cursor onto the ad itself and not touch anything for multiple seconds before it played.

        I owned the OG chromecast and chromecast 2 before that, and you are right, that one didn’t have ads, but it also didn’t have much of anything really.

        • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          I bought CCwGTV when it first came out, I don’t recall the adbar at the top ever not being present.

          It just was strictly ads for TV shows / movies for the first while and “external” ads for stuff like mcdonalds only showed up later.

          But I’m pretty sure I remember ads for Black Widow on it front and center, and that was only 5? 6? months after it came out. (The ads were showing up 1-2 months prior to theatrical release iirc?)

            • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              Oh, yeah innthat case I agree.

              Either way the mechanic of “you have to move the cursor to purposefully hover on the ad, abd then wait multiple seconds, and then not click anything” opt in behavior on the ads has lnt changed since day one.

              So seeing news articles pretending this is anything new at all really just goes to show how shit “journalism” has gotten over the years. Literally like, 5s of looking this up and you’ll find out this isn’t anything new.

              SMH

    • @machinin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      I’ve had an Android TV for about five years. I recently bought a TV with Google TV. I don’t know if this is how Google TV has always been, but it wasn’t that way in Android TV.

      Seeing the home screen on the Google TV made me immediately regret the purchase. Unfortunately, the model I bought disabled the ability to make alternate launchers default. I was able to put it in app mode, but it was still plastering ads everytime you turned on the TV or hit the home button. Absolutely disgusting.

      The home screen is so bad I finally set up pi-hole on my network. Now there is just a blank area where the ads used to be with a notification saying I’m not connected to the internet, although my services are fine.

      I’ll never by a Google TV again unless I can make alternative launchers default. I’m really glad I installed pi-hole, those TV send so much info back to Google. I recommend it to anyone.

        • @machinin@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Yeah, it was much better, but still had ads showing everytime I turned on the TV. The only real fix was the pi-hole blocking the domains I posted on another comment.

      • danhakimi
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Smart TVs are the stupidest fucking things.

        No TV manufacturer is actually willing to put processing power or networking features in a TV, and they’re never willing to spend money developing the software, so even new, they’re slow as shit, and you can no longer realistically use them for 10 years, they’ll go obsolete. A $35 external computer is more powerful and I’ve been using mine for a decade now without a problem. The interface is more straightforward. I don’t need to log into anything. I don’t need a special remote, I can just use my phone. The TV manufacturer can’t spy on me. There’s no microphone.

        Dumb TV + Chromecast is just a thousand times better than a smart TV.

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      Yeah, I’ve never heard of the ads people complained about. Mine was just what new streaming show was being promoted. Kind of an add, but relevant and only on home screen.

      But…

      My Sony TV 100% was playing the Hardee’s ad today.

      It’s not a huge deal, but still worse than it was yesterday

    • TunaCowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Have some standards people.

      Yeah, we should all be out protecting mega corps from bankruptcy by fighting inconsequential misinformation on obscure social media platforms. Where would the world be without heroes like you? Thank you for your service.

      🏅

      • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So you think it’s okay to spread misinformation if it’s about a giant corporation?

        Misinformation is never okay, as it muddies the waters and makes it hard to know what you can trust. If we idly stand by and let a lemmy instance degrade to the point where garbage posts like this are commonplace, it becomes difficult to sift apart the actual news and stuff that matters from the shit deluge of misinfo.

        Which means, yes, calling out misinformation / shit posts even if it’s about a megacorp, because shit in the water is still shit in the water.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          There’s no misinformation you’re just pissed you got called out.

            • Aniki 🌱🌿
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              Some of us live in reality and some of us accept advertisements in products you paid for. 🤷

              • @pixxelkick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Whether or not you care about ads doesn’t have any bearing on what is, and isn’t, misinfo.

                I don’t like ads either and use piholes on my network.

                Doesn’t change the fact the news article is misinformation, plain and simple.

  • danhakimi
    link
    fedilink
    615 months ago

    It’s weird how much better Chromecast was when it came out than it is now. Stronger hardware, sure, but no real antifeatures, you could set it up without installing the app, you could use the app without giving it location data, casting was way more straightforward…

    • @dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Idk…I had to throw out my first gen Chromecast because it does fuck all compared to literally any other streaming stick and it could no longer play HD videos without lagging to shit. When they added Android TV, it became a hell of a lot more useful.

    • @Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      I have the first Chromecast. Google emailed me a few years ago that it’s no longer supported, and that it’ll be a brick soon. That was about 3 years ago. As long as I can project my desktop, it works for me!

      And I was getting really concerned about getting the latest model too.

      • @d00ery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I’m still on an early gen Chromecast and never see any adverts. Very occasionally crashes (once a fortnight).

      • @Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        I just fired my gen1 up on my 1080p screen and it looks like crap. I think they have already deprecated the bandwidth?

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Amazing that blocking DNS is still a thing for gadgets like this.

      • Dran
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Dns resolution is integral to load balancing and regional content delivery. There is no universe where a single server, even a specially designed asic, could handle proxy routing if there was a DNS outage and every iPhone or android device or whatever failed to a single IP. Thank God the Internet works this way tbh, dns-based content blocking will probably be the only thing we can do eventually

          • Dran
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            I can’t say I’ve ever seen that, but it wouldn’t be hard for an iptables rule at the egress to just block outgoing traffic to 8.8.8.8. it’s not a great workaround for content providers. Especially because there’s definitely a universe where Google kills their DNS offering and a bad actor sets up a DNS server on the same static IP. Not that this isn’t an issue for domains too, it’s just another immutable and this one costs more than a subdomain to maintain.

      • @lone_faerie
        link
        English
        55 months ago

        There are apps that circumvent DNS blocking. They hard code the DNS server into the app, so instead of making requests to your set DNS, they make them directly to, say, Google’s DNS (8.8.8.8)

        • kratoz29
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Yeah, that is why I find it amazing that it works for some apps.

          • @lone_faerie
            link
            English
            35 months ago

            Honestly, I’m surprised it works too, especially for apps like the launcher. I guess we can thank the engineers for taking the easy route

          • @lone_faerie
            link
            English
            25 months ago

            Rerouting DNS requests to your Pi Hole is the solution to this, unfortunately not every router supports this. My Netgear router, for example, doesn’t have the option, and of course I ended up getting a model that doesn’t work with custom firmware. I’m considering setting up a Raspberry Pi as the gateway for my network so I can do stuff like this.

  • @xonigo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Download another launcher, set it as default home, and forget about google’s excessive ads. Depending on your model, you may need to run an ADB command. You may need to get a remote remapper app to remap the home button to open the launcher

    I am using this one for my android tv https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.spocky.projengmenu

    And flauncher for my chromecast https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=me.efesser.flauncher

    • @ToppestOfDogs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I wanna piggyback onto this comment to say that you can change the home launcher on a Chromecast With Google TV (And some other Android TV boxes) by downloading another launcher first (I use FLauncher) and disabling the default home launcher.

      1.Download FLauncher first

      2.Enable USB debugging

      3.ADB into your TV’s IP from a computer

      4.adb shell pm disable-user --user 0 com.google.android.apps.tv.launcherx

      This will disable the original launcher

      5.adb shell pm disable-user --user 0 com.google.android.tungsten.setupwraith

      This will disable the service that re-enables the launcher

      This will cause the home button on the remote to fall back to whatever other home app is installed. No button remapping needed. It will also break the YouTube button, but not the Netflix button.

    • @Osiris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ive been using ivy on my Chromecast it’s good, but Flauncher looks more like what I want.
      Protip for Chromecast users - disable the stock launcher via adb to set a new default

    • @Gamera8ID@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      While I am normally a fan of tendies, this ad was the final straw for me with the GoogleTV launcher. I’d been in app-only mode, but now I’m rocking Project Ivy instead. Thanks for the recommendation!

  • Faceman🇦🇺
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    All the more reason to fire up adb and replace that launcher before they take that ability away.

  • @sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    135 months ago

    Show your local Carls Jr. how much you appreciate this shit by throwing a brick through their front window today.

  • LiveLM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    125 months ago

    I wanna see what the “they’re not ads, they’re recommendations!!!” crowd has to say now

    • @treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Or just don’t connect the TV to your network. It has inputs. Use an input device you have control over. The end.

      • @exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 months ago

        a Chromecast is one of those inputs. And it has been a nice product. The reason people are mad is that they Google changed the product after they bought it significantly.

        and yes. Today the only reasonable good TV is a computer monitor connected to a device I have control over.

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Or get a decent TV?

        My LG oled has options to disable ads, and I never see ads when using the apps or the menu that launches them.

        I still have a PC connected to the TV, but many of the TV’s apps do a good job.