• platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I get your point. You’re saying that “subliminal” wokeness is better than “in your face” wokeness because the later messes with the core of the series.

    Honestly, I agree. Unless it is a show dedicated to social issues like racism, sexism or homphobia, try to keep the wokeness subliminal. Just show that it’s fine for these things to happen, that it is normal and acceptable, that it isn’t a big deal. Don’t make it the whole show, it’s just awkward.

    I prefer when they show me what reality should be like. LGBTQ people in our social groups as if nothing special was happening at all. Once it becomes preachy and brainwashy, I’m out.

    • roscoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s what they did. Stamets and Culber were just there. Grey and Adira were just there. They used elements of the symbiote story as an allagory but their NB status just was. It seems like you’re making it bigger in your mind.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m assuming you’re not a racist or homophobic so how can something that’s true “become brainwashy”? Doesn’t brainwashing imply a reduction in critical thinking? You may not like the “preachy” way facts are presented but they are still facts. Forcefully pushing ideas is preaching, not brainwashing.

      • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think it is forced exposure, trying to program people. I don’t think it is bad if it helps spread tolerance, I just don’t enjoy watching stuff that forcefully pushes ideas, even if I agree with those ideas.

        I think that’s exactly what the people calling this “too woke” are about. Like, exposure is so forced and obvious that it ruins the show for them. It doesn’t feel like a show anymore, more like advertisement for ideologies.

        I don’t think they are saying “please no homosexuals on TV”, they are saying “please, focus on the plot, not on the social issues that surround homosexuality”.

        As for my personal preference, I’ve always thought sex in movies is just awkward in general.

        • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Since these characters were introduced people have said what you’re saying over and over. Always with the same “I don’t have a problem with gay/trans/NB but…” disclaimer. Then they refuse to give examples of the characters doing anything other than existing. This thread is a good example. Please refresh my memory. Which episode(s) focus “on the social issues that surround homosexuality.”

          Outside of the scene where Adira tells Stamets their pronouns and the use of those pronouns, give me one line, in one scene, in one episode, of one season that would have to be changed if Adira was a cis straight human woman hosting the symbiote of her deceased cis straight Trill boyfriend.

          Give me one line, in one scene, in one episode, of one season that would have to be changed if either Stamets or Culber was a woman.

          To be clear, although I don’t remember any, I’m not saying you couldn’t find any examples. I’m just curious what constitutes “forced and obvious” plot elements that are “advertisement(s) for ideologies” that “ruins the show” for you.

          Without examples all anyone hears is you bitching about the existence of these characters the way Archie Bunker would have bitched about Uhura simply existing.

          • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s not ruining anything for me. I just said I understood his point. Everyone has a different threshold for what they consider preaching, it’s pretty subjective.

            If he thinks that, then you should ask him. I just said I understood his point because I have felt this in the past with other shows. I’ve been on both sides of the discussion many times. After many times, you realize there’s no point in fighting about it, people won’t change their minds.

            I just said my personal preference: when they act like it is totally normal and not a special event. That’s the sweet spot for me. I’m guessing some may see that as homophobia, and others may see that as brainwashing. That’s just the point I personally enjoy when it comes to these matters.

            • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              If you see his point you should be able to give one example of “preaching” other than the characters existence.

              • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                No, if I see his point doesn’t mean I agree with his point. I see it. I’ve been on his side of this discussion before.

                It is totally relative, why do you need to be so divisive? I was trying to be understanding with him, I wasn’t joining a side. Just saw everyone attacking him and thought it was just a matter of personal preference not rooted in hate.

                Do you think there is a series that is too woke or pushy? There’s probably someone who disagrees with you if you do, probably a whole community.

                Saying that no series is too woke is also an opinion that would get a lot of disagreement.

                You see? These are opinions.

                • Jmdatcs@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  To see their point, you would have to think there is at least something to it.

                  Their, and your, inability to support that point makes it nonsensical to me.

                  Why do you see their point? What is at least one example of “woke(nees)” or “push(iness)” that makes your see their point? Or do you just agree with them on a visceral level that requires no explanations?

                  • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I already told you that seeing someone’s point doesn’t mean agreeing with their point. Do you disagree with this? If you do, I’m OK with it and we can move on.