lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoLinus Torvalds interview Reader's Digest - 2001lemmy.mlimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1472file-text
arrow-up1472imageLinus Torvalds interview Reader's Digest - 2001lemmy.mllemmyreader@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square48fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareℕ𝕠𝕓𝕠𝕕𝕪 𝕆𝕗𝕗𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year ago Your browser does not support playing HTML5 video. You can download a copy of the video file instead.
minus-squareChemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoin flesh and bones
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoAhh, I thought it was somebody else you were talking about since DOS was never open source
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIt was about ms basic at the time I believe.
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoInteresting, so they had an open source product back then?
minus-squareAnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoNo, but they were very adamantly against the sharing of ms basic which was their big product (before dos), at a time when software sharing was fairly common.
minus-squareQuazarOmega@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoOh ok, makes sense. Funnily enough, it seems they decided to make it open source about 40 years later
Mr.Redmond
in flesh and bones
Ahh, I thought it was somebody else you were talking about since DOS was never open source
It was about ms basic at the time I believe.
Interesting, so they had an open source product back then?
No, but they were very adamantly against the sharing of ms basic which was their big product (before dos), at a time when software sharing was fairly common.
Oh ok, makes sense.
Funnily enough, it seems they decided to make it open source about 40 years later