• GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is dumb. Just because you don’t use logarithms doesn’t mean you never use deduction or process of elimination. Math is not solely about the numbers. The process is far more beneficial in many disciplines.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      The same vain is people arguing that schools should be teaching important things like budgeting, interest rates, taxes etc.

      These things a trivial if you have the maths skills. These things are also subject to change, the maths doesn’t.

      Worst of all, these things are all taught (in Scotland), the people complaining about school not teaching them weren’t paying attention.

  • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s also a day without using anything he learned in art, or geography, or chemistry, or English literature, or history, or pretty much anything he studied in school after age 10. Why does math get singled out?

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because math is abstract and difficult to relate to. We should be taught practical applications of the abstract concepts, and the exam questions should be more practical.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        yeah i think most of us were taught by people who didn’t “understand” math either, so we don’t really get what it is that we’re doing, we just memorize the process to get the numbers to match, which isnt fun at all. I had a very difficult time in school with math.

        When i was reintroduced to math functions as an electrician (and an adult) and the numbersoup actually described tactile, real world connections i had a much more fun time learning them.

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I demand only the practical parts of art and history be taught in school.

        Also - the questions that focus on practical applications are called word problems, and they get complained about more than anything else.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The biggest thing I learned from math was training yourself to think and problem solve. To always want to learn the next level of whatever you were learning, whether it’s math English or whatever.

        I don’t think I’ve ever used much math knowledge in my life … but it gave me the ability and enthusiasm of wanting to always want to solve a problem no matter how complex it was.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The reason why they’re abstract and difficult to relate to is because we’re all being taught maths backwards.

        In science, a phenomenon is observed and then maths is used to create a set of equations describe it’s behaviour. Then using the equations, other experiments can be designed to prove other hypothesises. This is known as the experimentalist approach to science.

        Engineering is the same but less research and more application focused. For example, I need to design a wooden shelf that is A inches/meters long and supports B lb/kg of weight. How do I do that? Using trigonometry and Newtonian physics to work out the dimensions.

        Finance is often used for basic algebra and calculus.

        However, it is not always helpful to work in the material when using mathematics and the abstract is preferred. This is usually only useful for the theoretical approach in science, in theoretical mathematics, or at the cutting edge of engineering disciplines.

        If we were taught by being presented with a problem first, I think it would make it easier to make the leap into the abstract when required for other applications. And on top of this, it would make it much easier for the majority who only ever need to use mathematics as a tool.

        • quaddo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          “If Johnny has 3 apples, and Jane takes 1 apple, how many apples does Johnny have?”

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Depends.

            Did Jane take an apple from the only source of apples stated in the question; Johnny? If so then 2.

            Did Jane take one apple from a source not stated in the question. If so then 3.

            Has Jonny eaten any of his apples? If so then |3-n| where n is the number of apples Johnny has eaten.

        • nieceandtows@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I would have certainly loved it if they showed me the actual problem and then solve it with math, instead of showing how to solve abstract, non-real-world problems in math using a bunch of complicated theorems that you just have to memorize (I know they can be solved, but you still have to memorize them for when you need to use them).

            • Coreidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Because there is no need to pluralize the word. Math is short for “mathematics” so writing “maths” just makes you look stupid.

              Ultimately it’s the same reason why you don’t say “admins” for administrator or detoxs for detoxification.

              Do you say flus? No you say flu because it’s the shortened version of influenza.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Maths is short for mathematics, and neither is plural. Math, maths, and mathematics are all equally correct. I love when Americans tell people they look stupid because they don’t do something the way Americans do it.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Another day of not needing to know that Constantinople was the capitol of the Byzantine Empire.

      Of course these days they go by a different name. Not sure why tho

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think it’s because some types of math are kind of all or nothing, either you know it or you don’t. If you recall half of what you learned in history you have some usable knowledge.

    • Mamertine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use basic math daily. I use algebra frequently.

      I have not use trigonometry since I passed high school trigonometry.

      Most people in modern society don’t use it.

  • Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    I literally, 30 seconds ago, used sin^-1() to calculate the angle for a roof I need to make for my indoor greenhouse, so the asshole cats don’t fall through the cheap plastic

  • Agosagror@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I had a maths teacher who upon being asked, whats the point in maths? Or whenever he heard I’m not going to use this in the rest of my life! Would break into a ten minute speech. You have to study maths because what it is at it’s core is just doing the same thing over and over again with slight variations. -more waffle I can’t remember- and after school you will go off to some job where you do the same thing over and over again where you will spend the next 60 years of your life. And then you die.

    It got quite depressing.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      “No John, you probably won’t ever have to use trigonometry in your life. But some of the smart kids probably will”

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      at it’s core is just doing the same thing over and over again with slight variations

      Man, that just makes me hate how maths is taught

  • southernbrewer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you ever have to cut a bit of wood to act as a diagonal brace it’s pretty useful to whip out the old tan. So I’ve used this every time I built a gate.

    That’s four times in the last decade, so not exactly daily but I’m glad I knew how to do it or my gates would have sucked.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve got a table to build, and I’m doing my best to remember the maths needed to figure out the angles before I start cutting the wood.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think carpenters, framers, cabinet makers, etc use more math than I do day to day working as a devops engineer with an aerospace degree.