BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 年前New gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square318fedilinkarrow-up1622
arrow-up1622imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square318fedilink
minus-squareIsoprenoid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 年前Why not both? Benefit to minorities and benefit to majorities. This isn’t a zero sum game.
minus-squareGlitchington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 年前Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?
minus-squareIsoprenoid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前Did … did you even read my post? What is going on? Let me re-write it using your analogy. Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities. This isn’t a zero sum game.
minus-squareGlitchington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.
Why not both? Benefit to minorities and benefit to majorities.
This isn’t a zero sum game.
Let me get this straight, if you have food to survive, and someone else who doesn’t have food wants some food, not even your food, just some food, you need more food before they get any at all?
Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?
Let me re-write it using your analogy.
Everyone should have food, my point is, the majority shouldn’t get extra food just because the minority are getting enough food now.