• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    MIT is free for commercial use and just requires attribution, you aren’t required to open source software derived from MIT licensed code.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      GPL is also free for commercial use… all open source licenses are. The rendering engines used by Safari (and Chrome/Edge) are GPL.

      • ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        GPL can be used for commercial purposes, but it requires all software derived from it to also be open source and GPL compatible. So no one whose commercial business relies on selling software will use GPL because their customers can copy and distribute the code.

        Neither Safari nor Chrome’s rendering engine is GPL. Safari’s engine is LGPL, which means the binary library can be linked into a closed source program, but modifications to the library’s code must remain open.

        Chromium is BSD, which doesn’t even require modifications to remain open. So I can take chromium’s source, change it however I want for my own browser, and never distribute that code.

        If Safari’s and Chrome’s engines were GPL, Safari and Chrome would be forced to be open source, and they very much are not.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thanks for pointing it out. I was making a project that uses this license and derivatives had to use MIT license. I forgot that it’s not copyleft and so it allows derivatives to be proprietary.