The targeting of another U.S.-owned commercial ship Wednesday shows the militant group remains intent on continuing its attacks in the face of multiple rounds of U.S. military airstrikes.

The Houthis launched anti-ship ballistic missiles at the U.S.-owned, flagged and operated commercial ship Maersk Detroit as it was transiting the Gulf of Aden, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command. The U.S. Navy destroyer USS Gravely shot down two missiles and a third fell into the water. There were no indications of damage or injuries in the attack.

The U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes against the Houthis to degrade their capabilities since Jan.11, after several weeks of attacks on commercial ships by the militant group.

    • trevor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And even if you’re a ghoul and think that complying with that very reasonable demand wouldn’t stop the Houthis, why not call their bluff? It costs us nothing to simply stop allowing the genocide to happen, and if the Houthis continue attacking ships, then you have a much more legitimate reason to go after them.

      Or are the people that are in favor of bombing Yemen just really eager to bomb?

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Saudis have been bombing it for Allah knows how long, so it’s business as usual for everyone involved.

        • trevor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s neither here, nor there. The answer isn’t to make the bombing in Yemen worse.

          If the only demand is to stop genociding Palestinians, then the US government should simply stop supporting Israel in their genocide.

          If the Houthis continue attacking ships after that, then by all means, do what you need to do to handle the Houthis. But the US government can’t even be bothered to call for a ceasefire, so they leave it up to militant groups to act.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            They are actually in the process of calling for a ceasefire. Biden pissed off Netanyahu as well. There’s diplomacy in the background to get a ceasefire and more hostages freed.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And were doing it with bombs sold to them by the US and UK.

          I wouldn’t be surprised if the serial numbers on some of the stuff the US and UK is now dropping directly on the Houtis shows them to be from the same batches as some of the stuff that was dropped on them via the Saudis.

          The idea that the US and UK cutting off the middleman to keep on doing to the Houtis what has been done to them for a decade, is going to make the Houtis change their minds, is hilarious.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It CoStS us nOtHiNg

        You really don’t know what you’re talking about when it comes to policy. It’s not just a simple “okay let’s cut ties with Israel”.

        • trevor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Calling for a cease fire isn’t “cutting ties with Israel”, and if you think that funding a genocidal ethnostate is a necessary part of foreign policy, your foreign policy would have been very helpful for the Axis Powers, you absolute monster.

          • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            They actually might throw a hissy fit if we withhold aid and expel US diplomats or something. We’d lose a major base in the middle east, but (if you’ll allow for a little American exceptionalism) they don’t call the fucking shots here.

            • trevor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ll allow for what you’re referring to as American exceptionalism if it’s reflective of reality. And, in the case of the US being a world superpower, and Israel’s top (external) source of military funding, that is the reality.

              So, yes. The far-right Israeli government might throw a hissy fit over the US government adopting a “genocide is a non-starter” policy for supporting them, but the US calls the shots. If Israel doesn’t like it, too fucking bad.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure, agreed, probably. I don’t believe one atrocity justifies another though (like the holocaust doesn’t justify… Literally anything they’ve used it as justification for), and the problem is the houthis aren’t just fucking with US and Israeli related ships, they’re impacting global trade.

      Backing down in the face of violence (even if it is the correct thing to do in this particular situation) only empowers them to cause more violence because it works. That’s why the US doesn’t (typically) negotiate with terrorists.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah I’m not saying the Houthis are right here (they’re being too indiscriminate), but giving into their demands is objectively the morally correct action. They’re using a wrong method to make a correct point.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Am I mistaken, or is the situation with the Houthis and Saudis in Yemen entirely unrelated to the current conflict in Gaza? These are two separate things. The Houthis aren’t disrupting international trade as a statement about Gaza… Like do you have any idea what we’re even talking about in this thread?