Hal-5700X@lemmy.world to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 10 months agoThe Pokemon Company releases a statement regarding Palworld: Inquiries Regarding Other Companies’ Gamescorporate.pokemon.co.jpexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up150file-textcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.cagames@lemmy.world
arrow-up150external-linkThe Pokemon Company releases a statement regarding Palworld: Inquiries Regarding Other Companies’ Gamescorporate.pokemon.co.jpHal-5700X@lemmy.world to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square20fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.cagames@lemmy.world
minus-squareRachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·10 months agopokemon doesn’t own the concept of monster colectors
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @monyet.cclinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·10 months agoThe accusation isn’t about the concept but the artwork.
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-210 months agoPokémon doesn’t own the concept of cute magical anime animals either. Infact I’m pretty sure it’s a common anime trope. If they could do shit about this, Digimon and Yokai Watch would not exist.
pokemon doesn’t own the concept of monster colectors
The accusation isn’t about the concept but the artwork.
Pokémon doesn’t own the concept of cute magical anime animals either. Infact I’m pretty sure it’s a common anime trope.
If they could do shit about this, Digimon and Yokai Watch would not exist.
Never said they did.