Bill Gates wants ultra-wealthy individuals to pay more tax — and now a growing chorus of billionaires agree.

In his annual “Ask Me Anything” forum on Reddit last year, the Microsoft cofounder said he was “surprised” that taxes for the rich haven’t been increased more.

Gates doubled down on his calls to tax the rich in a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week. He said the wealthiest nations should donate more money to developing countries to help redress inequality.

“Those who have the most — whether it’s countries, companies, or individuals — should be pushed to be more generous,” he said.

It seems others agree, as more than 250 ultra-wealthy people signed an open letter calling for global leaders to impose a wealth tax.

  • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 months ago

    Literally nothing is stopping any of them from cutting a massive check to the government. This is lip service to stop people from hating on the billionaire class.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except the issue is systemic. You have a percentage of mega wealthy who simply don’t even pay their share. A few billionaires sending a large check to the government doesn’t fix anything. They could but until we change the way we handle taxes for the wealthy, we have a systemic problem we need to fix.

      Speaking out that all the rich should pay more helps (maybe) make the case that those making hella bank should pay more.

      Your statement is a bit of a straw man which doesn’t actually address the fact that the mega rich aren’t paying their fair share.

      • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Except I wholeheartedly agree with you. There is a huge issue here, but at the same time if these billionaires truly believe that they should be paying more, they should just… do it. There is literally nothing stopping them. They should be forced to, yes, and that’s what they’re saying. But they should be putting their money where their mouths are in the meantime.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          The man is covering like 11% of the WHO budget. On the one hand I want to say that that’s too much power, OTOH he doesn’t do too terribly a job at allocating money (compared to, say, the IMF) and every man deserves a hobby.

        • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ah I see. I apologize if my comment came off as overly rude. I have heard the comment of them sending money as a reason to do nothing.

          I assumed you were advocating we do nothing, which to me implies keep the taxes low on the rich and just let them send whatever they want.

          I think saying that their taxes should be raised is doing something. Sending extra cash money into the giant money pit is kinda pointless until we address the military industrial complex getting the lion’s share and we start using the money more effectively.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The billionaires complaining about wealth taxes, should lead by example by paying them at the same time lobbying governments to fix the issue.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They buy politicians left and right, but THIS issue is completely out of their hands.

      Hang on, my eyes rolled so far back I need to cough them up now

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you are cutting massive checks for the social good, private charitable organizations are typically better stewards of the money than the government. Unless you want the military to have more fighter jets, I suppose

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Except you think they’re actually using the money for charity, when it is actually a way to pass the money to children/heirs without paying inheritance tax…

            • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              These philanthropy projects are definitely tax shields but they actually do have to do charitable work to keep their tax-exempt status.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you think billionaires paying more taxes to governments will mean better lives for the poor then oh boy do I have a bridge to sell you.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It means better lives for those poor executives of military contractors. Think of Lockheed-Martin’s children!