The Biden administration and the Israeli government diverge sharply over how Gaza should be governed when the war ends.

The Biden administration and the Israeli government diverge sharply over how Gaza should be governed when the war ends.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel on Thursday appeared to rule out a postwar peace process that would lead to the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state, rebuffing calls from the United States and others to start working toward that goal.

“In any arrangement in the foreseeable future — with an arrangement or without one — Israel must have security control over all the territory west of the Jordan,” Mr. Netanyahu said at a news conference, referring to an area including occupied territory that Palestinians hope will one day become their independent state. “This clashes with the idea of sovereignty. What can you do?”

The Biden administration and the Israeli government have diverged sharply over how Gaza will be governed when the fighting ends. President Biden and his top diplomat, Antony J. Blinken, have urged Israeli officials to move toward the eventual establishment of a Palestinian state. Mr. Biden has suggested that a “revitalized” Palestinian Authority, which is based in the West Bank, run a post-Hamas Gaza as an interim step toward that goal.

But Israeli officials have repeatedly dismissed such calls, saying they are focused on the war in Gaza. On Thursday, Mr. Netanyahu told reporters he had rebuffed the latest exhortations.

Non-paywall link

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    26·
    10 months ago

    Netanyahu is going to wreck Joe Biden’s reputation and allow Trump bank in power. US democracy is doing to die and the world might be thrown into chaos and a third world war thanks to Israël.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      10 months ago

      I’m sure Netanyahu would much rather deal with Trump. All he has to do is compliment his big, manly hands and the orange shitbird will do whatever Bibi asks.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        8·
        10 months ago

        Biden also does whatever Bibi asks, he just is more vocally whiny about it. There’s functionally zero difference.

        Trump is definitely worse domestically, but I just don’t buy that he’d be worse on this issue specifically.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
          13·
          10 months ago

          Biden also does whatever Bibi asks, he just is more vocally whiny about it. There’s functionally zero difference.

          I disagree. Trump is essentially amoral, there’s no request he wouldn’t consider. I don’t think Biden is doing nearly enough to stand up to Netanyahu but to say they are the same isn’t accurate.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            9·
            10 months ago

            Has there been a request that Biden won’t consider? I don’t mean when Biden vocally disagrees with something, I mean has he ever refused what Israel asks for materially?

            • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
              6·
              10 months ago

              Publicly? Not that I’m aware of. Behind the scenes, who knows?

              If you’re looking for a stark difference between the two on foreign policy, Trump would happily hand over Ukraine to his best buddy. Israel/Palestine is a different beast but to say the two Presidents are the same isn’t accurate.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                5·
                10 months ago

                Publicly? Not that I’m aware of. Behind the scenes, who knows?

                You have to realize, then, that it could be even worse behind the scenes. Biden needs to appease his angry base publicly, but privately? lol

                Trump would happily hand over Ukraine to his best buddy.

                Whereas Biden deliberately sabotaged peace talks to keep the war going. Let’s not pretend either side is “better” on that issue either.

                • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  7·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m not sure you understand how diplomacy works. You don’t have difficult discussions in front of TV cameras.

                  It’s not like I’m even a fan of Biden but your absolutist, “they are the same” stance needed a reality check.

                  Whereas Biden deliberately sabotaged peace talks to keep the war going.

                  Do you have a source on this?

                  • Revan343@lemmy.ca
                    7·
                    10 months ago

                    Whereas Biden deliberately sabotaged peace talks to keep the war going.

                    Do you have a source on this?

                    They probably mean ‘peace talks’ of the sort where Ukraine is expected to roll over and let Russia take them, and then there’ll be ‘peace’

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    5·
                    10 months ago

                    It’s not like I’m even a fan of Biden but your absolutist, “they are the same” stance needed a reality check.

                    Your only source for “they are not the same” is secret talks that you’re imagining in your own head. Fanfiction.

                    Do you have a source on this?

                    https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/f/us-repeatedly-blocked-ukraine-peace-deals-it-rethinking-its-strategy-yet

                    What is becoming all too apparent is that this conflict didn’t have to still be going on right now; it didn’t have to stretch into the bloody war of attrition that it has turned into. The killing could have ended long ago.

                    Though Arakhamia’s anti-semitism has him looking in the wrong direction for explanations as to why Ukraine is losing, he does offer insights that are useful for understanding why the battles in the east are still raging.

                    It is clear that the US and its allies were out to sabotage possibilities for peace immediately after the Russian invasion. Were it not for their interference, the current war could have ended in early March 2022 — about a week after it started. Thanks to Arakhamia, we now have confirmation of this fact.

                    He was at the talks in Belarus and said the Russians would halt the invasion and leave Ukraine if there was agreement on Ukrainian military neutrality and its leaders gave up on Nato membership.

                    Rather than report this to the public, however, the media in Europe and the US focused on sensational statements that were not actually part of those negotiations. They insisted that the Russians made official demands in the talks to “de-nazify” a country that the Allies said had no Nazis. Further, Russia supposedly demanded direct control of not only the eastern Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine but also other vast stretches of the country.

                    Madeleine Albright, the now-deceased and famous US diplomat, once said that during negotiations, one must distinguish between what participants really want and what is just political theatre. In Belarus in March 2022, the US chose to focus on political theatre, diverting attention from the two key Russian demands.

                    Arakhamia said that internationally mediated negotiations in Istanbul, shortly after the March 2022 talks in Belarus, actually produced an agreement between Ukraine and Russia to bring the fighting to an end — based on those same points.

                    “[The Russians] were ready to end the war if we accepted neutrality like Finland once did. And we were ready to make a commitment that we would not join Nato. When we returned from Istanbul, [then-British Prime Minister] Boris Johnson came to Kiev and said: ‘Do not sign anything with them at all; just go to war,’” Arakhamia said.