NASA lost contact with its Mars helicopter.
www.theverge.com
The Ingenuity helicopter, which has been fluttering around the red planet for almost three years now, fell out of contact with Perseverance, the rover that brought it to the planet (and that it communicates with using Zigbee!). NASA wrote yesterday that the flight, its 72nd, was a test of its systems after it was forced to land it early during its previous flight. The agency is working toward reestablishing contact. While we wait, here’s a recent video of the helicopter in action.
  • Kitten_Mittens@lemmy.worldEnglish
    163·
    10 months ago

    Considering it was just meant to be a proof of concept and only fly once or twice I would say that 71 flights, a max altitude of 78 ft(24 m), and 10.6 miles or 17 kilometers of travel, not to mention all of the footage from its on board cameras, makes Ingenuity an astounding success.

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      52·
      10 months ago

      Especially considering the use of off-the-shelf Snapdragon 801.

      There’s some nice discussion about Ingenuity here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26177619

      …This processor will have not flips on Mars, possibly up to every few minutes. Their solution is to hold two copies of memory and double check operations as much as possible, and if any difference is detected they simply reboot. Ingenuity will start to fall out of the sky, but it can go through a full reboot and come back online in a few hundred milliseconds to continue flying.
      -jhurliman

          • Rhaedas@kbin.social
            16·
            10 months ago

            During a flight is a bit much, but some aircraft have a reboot between flights as a standard procedure to fix glitches that would happen if the plane was left on for the entire time.

              • Rhaedas@kbin.social
                2·
                10 months ago

                Nothing that high level. Different systems are running independently, some may be redundant to each other in case one fails. But run something long enough especially in extreme conditions and things can drift from the baselines. If a power off and on regularly prevents that it’s a lot easier than trying to chase down gremlins that could be different each time they pop up for different reasons.

                Even NASA I believe has done such resets from Apollo through the unmanned probes from time to time. Mentioning Windows, the newest versions don’t really do this baseline reset if you just shut them down, even if you disable the hibernate/sleep modes, while a restart does.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      43·
      10 months ago

      NASA’s rovers have been kicking ass for the last few decades. Truly a testament to how great their engineering teams are

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
        26·
        10 months ago

        I think it exceeded everyone’s expectations. I know I’m pretty astounded. I didn’t realize it had been three years!

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          Based on how the rovers have over-performed on not that surprised (once we knew it could fly), but still very excited and impressed.

  • kuro24811@lemmy.worldEnglish
    26·
    10 months ago

    This isn’t the first time they lost contact so it may not be a huge issue in the end.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.websiteEnglish
      20·
      10 months ago

      It’s almost definitely because it doesn’t have Line Of Sight to establish the connection.

      Sort of like how cheap fpv drones will lose video when you fly into another room because the thin drywall blocks the signal enough and the signal can’t bounce off other objects in the right way.

      So I’m going with “once the rover catches up like last time it’ll be fine”