• EvokerKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    New York City tried that and we ended up with a subway full of crack addicts, homelessness, public nudity, etc. Trains should either be for a long trip but only once in a while or a last resort in a large city.

    • itslilith
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      last resort

      what do you suggest we do in large cities then?

        • itslilith
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Cars in big cities are horrible. Terribly inefficient, requiring orders of magnitude more infrastructure, killing air quality and pedestrians alike, and leading to even more suburban sprawl. Cars are not compatible with high population density.

          • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            How are they inefficient or at least less inefficient than other solutions? That infrastructure is already there, unlike others. And air quality is more affected by other things than cars.

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I visited NYC a while back. The subway impressed me. People call it dirty and say it is full of crackheads. Despite this, it was clean and orderly during my visit.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      How often do you ride the subway? Thousands of people take the subway in NYC everyday of all income levels, it’s a pretty big success.